Guys, open your brains for just a second. These are results with supposedly "academic limitations", and of course the athletes have to live in Indiana, as compared to our beloved Texas. If this is his coaching resume having to recruit the way he must recruit, then I have to imagine that his results at Texas would actually be better, because of the quality of the athletes he would get to recruit from Texas. The garden variety 4 star football recruit growing up in Texas still wants to give the flagship university a chance. We just need a coach who will make the athlete feel like he will get a good chance of improving his skills to prepare for the pros, and compete for a national championship.
All of that stuff is easier here for the head coach than at Notre Dame, if the "academic limitations" thing is correct.
Btw, those seven losses in four years. Hell, count it eight. Pick any four years of Mack in a row. Better or worse? How much? Now, do it again for DKR. Any four years in a row. Better or worse? How much? Do it again for Akers. Just exactly what is our standard? Remember, right now we're Tennessee, four losses in a year for 10 years in a row!
Yes, I would make Urban say no to 7 years/84 million first.
Next, I would go to Kelly or someone else of his proficiency level.