TtomTerrific

Y’all boarded up all the businesses. Wonder which group of voters they were worried about destroying our private property in a tantrum. Welcome to the pendulum swinging back Good luck with that

Fuck you Leave my country and if you are in Texas. Leave my state before you are removed You support criminal, insurgents and terroristic behavior. If I find you, I’ll remove you, film it and post it here

That’s all I said and all the betas in their feelings go ape shit. Y’all are actively dumping ballots out of no where, changing ballots, keeping monitors from their monitoring positions, physically, blocking out the windows from people seeing whatever it is you are up to. ACTIVELY destroying the franchise like you’ve done with the rest of the. Constitution . Now a judge has ruled that the monitors be allowed in and you’ve ignored THAT so police need to come and escort them back in. God knows what you’ve done while they’ve been not monitored. only answer is is that NONE of this will count You pussies will continue with. “There’s never been ANY REAL evidence of voter fraud . This will go to the Supreme Court where you know who is waiting for you [emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji3590][emoji3590] If this were being done by Republicans, major cities would be on fire now (cuz racism and that one black dude who posts here (“Pop?) is fucking your wives. But. No riots. Just justice You assholes ruined the country and you are in for a reckoning. Chuck Schumer and this broad https://images.app.goo.gl/PvVHJcT4BUezGFiL7 expecting her to “recuse herself” from rulings re:Constitutional Matters Buhhhhhbwaaaahahaha

Wait. The polls were full of shit? The hell you say!

Too early. Way ahead, that one

Biden truck ran into a Trump caravan truck - media loses their shit , while ignoring flat out looting of most of the stores in Philly...are ENRAGED at this Trump Army retailation! Who was the enlightened dipshit here who was asking what I would do if this "ever happened in Texas?!" Here's your answer, asshole! areful what you ask for when you stroke off to tribal warfare when you are the minority....pretty soon the majority will begin to act like it and you won't b e a fucking speed bump when this happens. Enjoy every bit of that which you have created....you are experiencing a "market correction" and everyone will lose.

psssst.....Joe....you're in Tampa Bay

really? cuz somehow the FBI is now looking into the groudswell stopping the Biden Bus on I-35 it's happening [/Ron Paul] [/it's happening like I told you it would if you kept on with this shit and it's your fault/TTom] funny what get's the FBI's attention nowadays.

Oh you could clearly go fuck yourselves. While we run over your bitchasses. Again Fuck You War.

Fair enough. And respectable considering your work within the legal system as your chosen path , I have no doubt that your opinion is grounded in career and very personal life experiences, as you come across as a guy who gets more than an arms length attachment to your cases/clients. In fact, reading and actually learning from your posts in these communities has actually taught me more than a little bit. So. In your view. (This is where we detach, because no matter how you answer this, no -insults from me are going to be considered much less offered). In your view. Is there any bedrock foundational code/law/system ethics/ scripture/bingo card. Anything that the rest of that very complicated system of jurisprudence had been built upon that is not malleable in anyway, particularly for the reasons of current political climactic pressures? I seem to remember your adherence to some sacrosanct idea of “prosecutorial discretion” as one of these. Not sure if that’s still your stance, but either way ....Is this Constitution - in the the form it’s written in and as (not some “White Board” utility for use in each election cycles’ committee hearings) perhaps a solid “bedrock” foundation from which any shot at unity might start? Or, fuck it, that shit’s garbage and written by drunk racists that lost meaning before it went to ink?

Damn. Brisket. I’d hoped that I could count upon you not participating among this decay of the “market place of ideas”. To use your folksy posting style to at least pretend not to plunge into the ad hominem. Damn- disappointing Anyway. Yes. The Bill of Rights was kept independent to Articles within the Body of the Constitution so to inform the Republic of their foundational tenets . And to draw specific, directed and focused attention to these rights. There was much debate surrounding this You could look it up. And don’t mistake this for me claiming to work day to day within an industry wherein adherence to this Constitution is a day to day requirement of mine to complete my daily tasks. It’s not You are a lawyer who doesn’t share my view on this and there are many other lawyers who also don’t share my view on this. But that doesn’t make you “right” because there are an abundance of lawyers who do share my view and, now an abundance of Supreme Court Justices (also lawyers) who do too. That’s why y’all losing your shit over Amy Barrett because she is committed to studying the law and ruling on whether or not what she is reading as law is coherent with the case in front of her. You want her to forget the law, ( when convenient for you politically) and adhere to your policy proscriptions and further affect change to that law. That shit just stopped. Sorry if you really, really, really didn’t want it to. Sotamayor is eagerly waiting guidance in this matter.

First person singular in the a Constitution? Tell me more

Oh. Well. “Critics say” Front page of Twitter with that

You assumed incorrectly and no , straight marriage isn’t in there either That’s all many of us were trying to say. Of course. Here. That makes me (us) an immediate hater of homosexuals. What we “hated” was your legislation from the bench and lumps like Sotomayor who are there only for that purpose while you have kept actual legal talent like Robert Bork( possibly the most giant legal scholar of our time) from that court somehow. Doesn’t matter in here though because anything against the group think posted here now is automatically vilified and personal attacks replete with some imagined “racism, homophobic , xenophobic ” assignments are not only immediate, but expected. Of course those who don’t agree with you are not wanting to face this vitriolic backlash. But I don’t care at all about that and only covet the expository “character revealing” of those who immediately turn to that sort of bombastic response as a reflection of who they really are, deep down, who would trade in some sort of political discourse for that, with the greatest dispatch. I could spend a lot of time (a) defending myself here to a bunch of fuckstuck beta male man-buns in skinny jeans or (b)let it go and continue to watch grown people act this way by scribbling out something that is obviously going to launch you into further hysteria orbit. I picked (b) so you can quit pretending that you are not one who would “go there” in a political discussion. We get it. The liberal (death spiral) orthodoxy needs be met in lockstep to post here or else the most vile shit possible is completely excusable. Here. The few times I’ve returned fire in this way I’ve been “warned about abusive posting” by the reasonable folks who moderate this space. So, allowing you your demonstration of character, here, in writing has been my effort so far until you begin to eat your young on Tuesday. Now. Fuck off

You know what the Constitution has to do with Glen Greenwald getting in a fight with his editors and resigning? Did you ever take a single fucking college-level class that covers the US government and the Constitution? Or even a high school-level class? several - some in 2016 at the Master's level and I am sure that election interfernce is not Constitutional. Neither is suppression of speech. see, those are actually in there, you abolute moron. Here's what NOT in there a "right" to abortion" a "right" to be married

It's all n-95 masks now...C'mon Gil at least try to look interested.

I don't find Hunter Biden a shitheel. The Bobulinski interview began with stipulating that his recruitment, engagement and authortiy was always to, through and by Joe Biden. The beginning of their first meeting was of the "Hunter is WAY out of his league for what I have in mind" variety. I think the "I'm clearly not voting for Hunter now" thing was misplaced from the beginning. Obviously if any of the underage sexual behaviours are verified, that's never excusable no matter the pressures, but I can see a tragic figure persona cut out in Hunter Biden. His Dad had him set up to be the insulation between his office and just direct payments to Joe, but his Dad also didn't have confidence in him, his Dad was taking larger and larger cuts of "Hunter's revenue" to the point of complaint and a notable scarcity of people buyin' what Hunter was sellin' happened after Biden left office, before the nomination (now its back full blast...or was until about 2 weeks ago). I get that you don't care, but can you honestly say that this is SO unnewsworthy as to have the New York Post banned from use of the Twitter platform due to how unnewsworthy it is? Hell, that in and of itself is newsworthy....ol' Jack banning the 4th largest newspaper in the country, founded by Alexander Hamillton....they don't meet with Twitter's rigorous set of posting guidelines?

Oh.....it's not good bye, Jimmy. It's a pulling back from anything that might spill over into someone's space whom I didn't and don't mean to be affected or effected in anyway. I know exactly the responses I'll get here and am prepared for that when I do that. You know I'm never far, Jimmy. Too much history here for a "good bye".... I have and will attack the group think as I see it, but never a person nor even do I find utility in the "neg" button here. I'm not about that. If you take this personally, you shouldn't....but that's not always realistic and I am sorry if any of this reparte has caused any sort of ill effect to anyone else. That's it. I'm not saying good bye at all.

Pat - I never said he was a grand wizzard either thanks for the added information though. The guy I was responding to was somehow attaching the virtue of the Civil Rights Act to one party now, and that has several nuanced rebuttals, most of which include LBJ's motivation being the greatest illustration of my broader point than any other one thing I can imagine, the point here was the Bob Bryd was the most vociferous oppoent of that legislation, as I detailed in the link I provided recounting his famous filibuster of same. Thanks for demonstration of your quick debunking chops, tho...I guess.

but one more thing.....THIS somehow passes the "journalistic integrity test?" Ol' Kyle Griffin gets straight to the front of the line at Twitter?

something wrong with my key board while I'm in "edit" mode my cursor seems to jump around quite a bit...sorry for the penmenship and spelling errors. actcually, sorry period. I don't want to be drug back into this. Y'all are cool with what's going on, you don't need it pointed out to you, you've already looked at it critically and decided that even that doesn't matter,...this is your board now and I will respect that. I like to get a charge out of the peasantry, that's just good fun, but I don't want all of this vitriol to get loose on anyone but me. I'm a big boy and can handle the constant insults and ad homienum ...but if that spills over to affect anyone else in any way, whether or not I am responsible, I don't want that around me whatsoever. What I find entertaining might effect someone else negatively and I genuinely never have nor will want for that to be the case. I'll ease up and allow you your echo chamber back....But don't think there aren't many more of me, lurking here, watching for what this place might look like Tuesday night. Cheers, gentlemen. Hook 'em Horns, as always.

.

you mispelled Tim Scott and the Senate....<.que your "token" bullshit racist as fuck response here> See, here's what's happening. The thing about IT manifesting ITSELF in the form of Donald Trump and his unignorable 33% growth in GDP DURING a COERCIVE ECONOMIC SHUT DOWN (cementing him further in history as the most productive President you've ever heard of, despite fighting the assholes who hate this country the whole time) the thing that is happening here is a tectonic shift in energy. In the spirit of your go to card - "every accusation is an admittance" while making a career at "victimization" so as to drum up appeal for your bullshit, destructive policy ever becoming popular...you ran out of legitimately being a "vicitim" of anything, so you went and co-horted those who had a legit beef (sometimes, sometimes not), marginalized the fuck out of that - but you didn't care...you amplified that pet cause in that news-cycle for your own perceived politcal advantage and allowed that particular group to suffer all the blow back from your faux outrage...you didn't care what happened to them because you never gave a shit in the first place (Me Too Movement crickets just one example)....you are being exposed. You are NOT smarter than everyone,...quite the opposite actually. So, anyway, what's happening here is this shift to who actually are the oppresors in this America? or, I guess in the vernacular of this forum "Who are actually the racists" - in terms you can understand - 1. Who manipulates the media in a transparent as fuck attempt to control the message? 2. Who turns the agencies of the government against the citizenry? Nixon was run out of office, correctly, because of almost NOTHING next to what the DNC considers SOP now 3. The big business tech giants and Wall Street aren't pouring buckets of money at Biden because he represents any sort of resistance to them whatsover. Trump was right about that in the debate, and you should have heard more about that, acutally. Biden being corrupt as fuck really didn't need to be a focus of anything, iet's already clear and justice will be meted out appropirately. He's been involved in a money laundering operation since 2018 - nothing Guilianni is doing isn't already well chronicled within the FBI. But the comprimising position Biden is in with his Wall Street benefactors...that's not a small thing when you have a completely frail, plyable, scared as fuck low energy, never made a dollar in the private sector that wasn't bribery shape like the old man y'all trotting out there until Pelosi can run her 25th amendment plans out and have Kamala and AOC ride this out....that needs more attention...But it would require that any journalist remaining care about the obvious, first...before anything "investagatory" should be expected. The group doing all of that is YOU....the places these riots are popping off are ALL in Democrat strongholds and you think its a bad look for YOUR POLITCAL gain that riots in Philly be shown on television so YOU don't inform the public - ON PURPOSE...but the beautiful thing here is that YOU are again misjudging what's happening here, PA is already lost but YOUR contrived news and polling doesn't let YOU know that. You can not keep a lid on this and watching you try is costing you MORE traction. This shit doesn't play anywhere outside of places like this, where you only like to read what you want to read for your own circle jerk, beta male bullshit. Everyone knows Biden was on the take, everyone knows the "Russia" thing was contrived and because YOU did that, you somehow are trying to excuse Biden's business partnership with the leadership of our nuclear enemy as "not news worthy" Hell, even Barrack was as late to help as he was because HE KNOWS EXACTLY how far gone Biden has become and doesn't want anything sucking him into it. I came here really to watch the implosion with popcorn as your self-awareness becomes ecessary and you need to again sort it all out for yourself and only find YOU as responsible. Have a nice weekend, Syd - you fucking moron - stop killing us! We aren't all Covid positive senior citizens in New York who can't fight back. We can, and will.

Glen Greemwald resigned from his own paper that HE CREATED SPECIFICALLY FOR JOURNALISTIC FREEDOMS....in NO WAY A “Conservative”. ....resigned from his own paper because they were censoring HIM!?!??!? Jesus you people. Is there anything in the Constitution that you respect at all? It’s clear all that you find abhorrent in it and ignore, the the things you find in it that aren’t there. But maybe it would be easier to just keep a list of what is in it that you would keep if , God forbid, you are ever a legit candidate for power.