Jump to content

The Deuce

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    307
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by The Deuce

  1. Mannnnnn…… we balled TF out today. Crowd was electric, defense was inspired, and we were prepared. Yes, ewers is that man. He got hurt, but we saw what is to come in the future. The progression shown from game 1 to game 2 was monumental (may or may not be due to play calls in gm1 Vs gm2). Defense was legit. Yes…. Allowed a huge run for 6, and last drive to get there, but all in all….. very fuckin solid. This team is heading in the right direction. We didn’t lay an egg. Those questioning Sarks ability as head coach should atleast be satisfied with what was shown on field today. We are gunna be back. Trust the mutha fuckin process
  2. Wasn’t dumb. JT wins that matchup all day if he’s not sodomized in the endzone
  3. Sark should have a flexible game plan offensively for this matchup. If he doesn’t, then I dunno what the fuck he was doing all off season. The install should have covered various formations and ensured that each QB knew multiple plays from each. After that, you expand on those for the more complex aspects that you wish for the QBs to eventually memorize. This allows for your offense to adapt/adjust rather quickly on the fly in games where glaring issues arise. Knowing that the O-line situation could result in you fielding group of youth/inexperience, proactive solutions should already be in place. O-line protection decent/good? All plays /formations available O-line protection average/poor? Narrow down to formations/plays that add pass pro assistance. O-line getting absolutely obliterated? Nothing but plays that involve short/quick passes that prevent Defenders getting home, or max protect packages that have versatility within the package There should be no scenario where an adjustment to the playbook cannot be made to handle the problem at hand.
  4. We are fuckin winning 3 times!! Pregame, game, halftime
  5. Hell, I dont even need to the outcome of a 3rd and long play. If you tell me the data sample size is 5+ instances, then I’ll take that all day
  6. They are giving them an untimed down? Wow
  7. They’ll put 2 seconds on the clock, LSU will false start, And the penalty will cause a run off. Game over
  8. Should we have turned it down? For what?
  9. I’ll make sure to notify LSU videographers currently perched on the hydraulic lifts
  10. Speak for yourself………. I would gladly take 4+ consecutive passes that travel 3 yards in the air and 17 on the ground
  11. I’d imagine Saban will gameplan to eliminate him and force any/everyone else to prove they can do it.
  12. Then I stand corrected. However, the 4 rushing attempts that didn’t go for 5+yds is accurate. It wasn’t some kind of situation where a few anomalies are skewing data on a bunch of 1-2yd runs. 70%+ of the rushing attempts (pre-backups) went for 5+yds
  13. The starters played until midway through the 3rd Qtr before backups were inserted. Before the back ups came in, there were 0 rushes that lost yardage, and only 4 rushes that gained less than 5yds. Not really sure what your gripe is about
  14. It’s certainly a valuable asset that’s been lacking on our roster for numerous years. The ability to have run/pass flexibility in personnel packages prevents the defense from diagnosing and adjusting pre-snap. Eventually, I’d assume Sark will have multiple run/pass options based out of one formation that he will allow Quinn to audible into based on defensive alignment . Probably nowhere near that stage at this point, though.
  15. I was surprised/impressed with skill position blocking in yesterdays game (especially JWhitt). If Bama is just blowing us up on the line and living in our backfield, expect swing passes to the flats to be a sort of “extended handoff” to give the backs space. There are always adjustments that can be made to counter the opposition. Sark just needs to be able to identify and implement it. Can/will he? Time will tell.
×
×
  • Create New...