Jump to content

Laxtonto

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    7254
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by Laxtonto

  1. Just curious.... How many users yesterday? Any peak and average users?
  2. It was pretty obvious that Sark told Arch to not scramble and he is still too young to just willingly throw it away. So instead, why not trust his arm and his NFL receivers against over-matched players in the secondary and launch it. Not the best set of routine to get into, but I can't blame him for being young. I would love to see him hold it a bit less and use his checkdowns, but if he was prohibited from scrambling he is not quite to the point in his development to just throw it away.
  3. Let Lourd throw then... fuck those guys
  4. doesnt matter.... Just let it fly arch
  5. effortless distance
  6. Bad decision kid
  7. 37 seconds... dont fuck this up Michigan
  8. And now we see Michigan collapse..
  9. LETS GO!!!!
  10. Is this the same Michigan team Texas destroyed?
  11. Fuck yeah!!!
  12. So the USC O sucks or the the Texas O is scary... Makes me laugh that it is starting to become obvious to the rest of the nation that maybe just maybe the Texas O and D are even better than the pundits were giving us credit for..
  13. So where does UNC rank in the pantheon of college football jobs open next year? I am guessing Florida is far and away #1, but what they of coach are we talking about for UNC? Like retread or cheap coordinator or are they still at the point that they will garner real interest?
  14. So maybe this is jsut tied to the API, but when I have it set up as "in progress" it takes out the games that are in commercial breaks between quarters. I am just trying to keep a screen up of all games that have kicked off and have not gone to final, but the in progress option sometimes drops games at half and in between quarters.
  15. Its a start. He is at least willing to put the system on blast and has enough reach to get the other pundits to steal will content. The real problem is I doubt the big names anchored to the various main conferences (heres looking at your big ears Finnebaum) will ever admit that there is an issue within their own conference. There isn't enough conference independent content out there to get this to quickly reach critical mass.
  16. So all of a sudden we see a massive uptick in secondary and tertiary hops in the ammunition supply chain. What I am more curious about isnt the how/what they are targeting but the "why". This is a major change in tactics and a much more visible approach than targeting long-range aircraft and various rail hubs. If we are looking at this strategically then, what does this do that is different that their prior approaches? Is Ukraine trying to bleed out the front-line troops of ammo to essentially starve off the current counterattacks in Kursk? Are we seeing a preemptive strike to look to limit the Russian stockpiles before winter to keep them from using the cruise missiles to target power infrastructure this winter? Are they trying to force Russia to be reactive and move their supply depots farther east? Is this more of a psychological set of targets to now sow fear in the Russian populace overall? Generally, when you look to cripple major hubs in the supply chain, the point is to create downstream disruptions to then force scarcity within the combat units to degrade their combat effectiveness. The problem with this approach is that it is time dependent. At some point, the enemy creates a workaround for those shortages. The other obvious reasoning is that these are targets that Ukraine just now has the ability to attack and they have decided to hit their highest value targets with this new weaponry while Russia has not yet developed a sufficient counter or changed their directives regarding munitions handling and storage. Some targets are just too juicy to pass up and when you have the means to reach them you do. So, my learned scholars, what does this mean? What is the goal here? With us still being in autumn in Ukraine, does the time dependent nature of this have any larger meaning?
×
×
  • Create New...