I am somewhat jaded in my viewpoints in this area because I am an Associate Editor of a reputable journal. Also, I do most of my research either in Business or Industrial Engineering journals.
When it comes to journals, there are no rules about journals only rules about if the journal counts as "quality" for the tenure process.
Is it backed by a major publisher (Elsevier, Emerald, Wiley. etc)? no...
Is it backed by a major society (CCSMP, OR Society, etc)? no...
Since its title supply chain, is it listed in the ABDC list? no...
Is it Cablles listed at all? no....
In this case it would not be considered a viable journal for most business schools in Texas for tenure.
So now is it considered a predatory journal or is it just a bullshit journal housed by the university? Looking through it and checking on the various journal ranking groups, it isn't cosidered predatory (ie pay for play) so it is obvious just a small inhouse journal that is used to help push recognition for the college or program.
What is funnier to me in their call for papers is this:
If you cant get UT right in the boilerplate...