suddenly shaggy

Narrator: He did.

Epidemic of defenestration starting to emerge.

It looks like a deflection to those of us paying attention, but it's working with the base and muddies it up for independents. His base absolutely believes that nothing Donald Trump has done or will do can be worse than something Hillary has done or would have done as president. They will excuse any behavior under that 'argument'.

That creep could roll.

I think I found the problem...

Since you seem to have missed it. You are the one making the claim that Memo 80 and the Mueller report contradict each other. You've shown no credible evidence to that effect. You then followed that lie up with more of your bullshit claims that Steele got disinformation from Russia and that is somehow a problem for the guy who ran the MI6 moscow desk. You are lying and trying to troll. I'll stick with the Washington Post, which has been winning Pulitzers while you've been embarrassing yourself.

Yeah, it's everyone on this board, except you and the other Trumpkins that has the honesty problem. You keep arguing those alternative facts, I bet Onboard and Chrispy think you're fighting the good fight.

Since you insist on belaboring everything, here is what you posted, complete with your lie. Your lie is in bold. “Russian regime has been cultivating, supporting and assisting TRUMP for at least 5 years. Aim, endorsed by PUTIN, has been to encourage splits and divisions in western alliance.” — Steele memo 80, dated June 20, 2016 WaPo Article- The Mueller report documents extensive Russian efforts to ensure Trump’s victory, through hacking operations and social media efforts. Mueller also details Trump’s business interests in Russia, especially pursuit of a Trump Tower project in Moscow.  Anastasis being intellectually dishonest- Nothing in this memo details hacking or social media operations by Russia. What this memo does discuss is "the Kremlin had been feeding Trump and his team valuable intelligence on his opponents, including clinton, for several years." It discusses a "dossier of compromising material on Clinton" comprising "bugged conversations she had on various visits to Russia and intercepted phone calls"..."and focused on things that she had said which contradicted her current position on various issues". None of these aspects are supported by Mueller's findings. Memo 80 fails on virtually every single claim in the "Detail" section when examined specifically. There is no incongruity between the following two statements. You lie when you say there is. The dossier says Russia is cultivating, supporting and assisting Trump for at least 5 years. The Mueller report shows some of the mechanisms for this. Statement 1- Russian regime has been cultivating, supporting and assisting TRUMP for at least 5 years. Aim, endorsed by PUTIN, has been to encourage splits and divisions in western alliance.” Statement 2- The Mueller report documents extensive Russian efforts to ensure Trump’s victory, through hacking operations and social media efforts. Mueller also details Trump’s business interests in Russia, especially pursuit of a Trump Tower project in Moscow.

Lulz, you lied in your very first point. You are a liar and it is pointless to argue anything of substance with a liar. Here's my post calling you a liar in case you missed it.

You lied in your very first point in your manifesto. If you lead with a lie, I'm not going to waste time on the rest of what you said.

No fucking way I'm reading this whole manifesto. You start being disingenuous with your very first point. Those two statements are perfectly consistent with one another and you're lying out both sides of your face when you claim they aren't. Then you launch into your diatribe about the possibility of Russians feeding disinformation to Steele. Who gives a shit? They probably did. The guy in charge of the Moscow desk for MI-6 has a lot of experience dealing with Russian disinformation. I'm sure you're nipping at his heels though. Why don't we see what the rest of the report says and hear what Mueller has to say and see what some of those redactions and Bill Burr are covering up? I'm pretty comfortable that the Washington Posts analysis is going to be more accurate than your disingenuous spin.

It's not the first trial balloon, it's at least the third. At least twice, Trump has "joked" that he would stay past eight years. Once he said he'd stay for 10 or 14 years, the other time he said he'd stay president for life. He can't leave office, he'll be criminally charged by NY at least. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-again-jokes-about-staying-on-as-president-for-more-than-two-terms/2019/04/18/05a5afce-6207-11e9-9ff2-abc984dc9eec_story.html?utm_term=.87ec31e2160c President Trump on Thursday joked about serving more than two terms as president, telling a crowd that he might remain in the Oval Office “at least for 10 or 14 years.” Trump made the comments on the same day that special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s report was released to the public. https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/03/politics/trump-maralago-remarks/index.html In the closed-door remarks, a recording of which was obtained by CNN, Trump also praised China's President Xi Jinping for recently consolidating power and extending his potential tenure, musing he wouldn't mind making such a maneuver himself. "He's now president for life. President for life. No, he's great," Trump said. "And look, he was able to do that. I think it's great. Maybe we'll have to give that a shot some day."

Lulz, I'm not triggered in the slightest. On the contrary, I'm glad the board has finally figured you out. You can pound away at the Cohen to Prague story all you want. It's the only thing in the dossier that has been shown to probably be false. It's also a single detail in a much larger set of evidence, but that's what you do. You take a single detail, strip it from any context, minimize everything else and then insist if that one detail doesn't turn out to be valid, the rest is ridiculous too.

Since we aren't in a declared war with Russia, traitor doesn't apply, so I think Comrade is a perfect term for someone advocating Russia sink two US aircraft carriers.

The real opportunity was the dingleberries she met along the way.

Take your gaslighting elsewhere Comrade, you've already exposed yourself on this thread and your shitty attempts to derail it and put this back on me somehow are childish. You know exactly what you were implying and just in case, you explicitly stated it on the last page. You want Russia to sink two US aircraft carriers, killing thousands of US service members and igniting World War III.

Should sticky that somewhere so we can just post a link when the trolls try to claim the Mueller investigation didn't reveal any evidence of wrongdoing. They have alternative reading skills, so they won't have read this post the next time they claim the investigation is a witch hunt.

You seem to think posters can't read halfway up the page to see what you posted. I'll help them out. Fozzz is hopeful that the Russians sink two aircraft carriers, killing thousands of US service members and igniting World War III.

Agreed. It's raw intelligence that should be only partially accurate. It helps form probable cause for an investigation and shows where to start digging. It's telling though that the only thing that has been proven false in the entire dossier is Cohen to Prague. Lots of the rest of it are verified or at least partially supported. Like so many other issues right now, Trumpublicans are busy gaslighting the rest of the public.

You just advocated for the deaths of thousands of US service members. You showed your true colors Comrade.

Nothing we do is going to help overthrow Maduro. It's going to have to come from the Venezuelan people. Unlike you, most of the posters on here are patriotic Americans whose loyalties lie with the United States. There is no scenario where we would wish death on US service members. You show your colors as a pro-Russia troll frequently, but this is one of your more blatant examples.

You shouldn't be. This is a bigger topic than scooters in Austin alone and no one goes to the Food/Travel forum. Your thread was perfectly appropriate. This is a better place to discuss it and you used a more inclusive title.

They are likely intended as a show of force, but that is completely irrelevant to the fact that you advocated for the deaths of thousands of US service men and women. You've repeatedly shown your loyalties lie with Russia, not the US, this is just more obvious than usual.

Anyone reading this thread consistently has a good sense for which posters are being intellectually honest and which ones are gaslighting pieces of shit. Anastasis is smarter than the rest of you though, so it took a little longer for the board to figure him out.

Can you even make a post without gaslighting? Nothing I said can even remotely be construed to get your response. It's like you're a bad chatbot.