Carried them to what, though? Same as Dak, 2 wild card wins. I'm not arguing who was more fun to watch, that is a personal preference. Romo was a poor man's Favre. Gunslinger, could make many plays leaving you in awe and then follow up with WTF throws. I mean, along the lines of Quinn Ewers at Texas. Just never consistently put it together to take the next step. Like Ewers never could make it past that semifinal round, Romo was 0-3 in the divisional round. Dak is also 0-3 in the divisional round. Both had #1 seed teams and lost to inferior teams at home in the divisional round.
Romo was fun to watch as a Dallas fan when he first came on in 2006 because this was coming off the black hole of Dallas QBs between Aikman and Romo. Coming out of the Dave Campo years. He was new, basically unheard of and hit the scene running. So much potential, especially his first full season as a starter, they got the 1 seed and looked to have a clear path to a Super Bowl. At this time, it had only been about a decade since their last SB appearance. Looked like Dallas could potentially build another era of winning but it never did and Dallas did nothing but spin in mediocrity his entire time here.