Jump to content

Vic Mackey

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    39896
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    20

Everything posted by Vic Mackey

  1. Great times
  2. Big catch!
  3. That's your call on 3rd and 6?
  4. Hahahahahaha Florida. Cornballs.
  5. Because Sark is not a good play caller, especially when the talent level isn't masking how poor he is
  6. Ceedee Wingo
  7. This offense fell off a cliff from the last 2 years.
  8. Early in his career and at Mississippi State, he was never fast but he was way more mobile than this. Did all these injuries take that away from him? He's pretty much Peyton Manning back there now. In today's game, if your QB is a statue, that takes away an entire element many QBs today have, extending the play. Whether it be taking off or using that time to find an open guy. If you aren't mobile, like Brady or Peyton, you better be a surgical tactician. Dak is far from that. Dak seems slower than ever now.
  9. Give Romo credit for 3 straight .500 seasons. Dak needs "help" for 3 straight 12 win seasons. Lol what? They both played in the same environment, with the same shitty coaching and front office who designed the teams the same way for both. It's fine if you prefer Romo over Dak, all you need to say. But to shift narratives and skew reality, nah. Both got you a few wild card wins spread about 5 years apart. Their careers are almost identical as can be. It just comes down to who you prefer. I would have preferred to had a better QB than both of them. Both get you the same results in the end.
  10. Carried them to what, though? Same as Dak, 2 wild card wins. I'm not arguing who was more fun to watch, that is a personal preference. Romo was a poor man's Favre. Gunslinger, could make many plays leaving you in awe and then follow up with WTF throws. I mean, along the lines of Quinn Ewers at Texas. Just never consistently put it together to take the next step. Like Ewers never could make it past that semifinal round, Romo was 0-3 in the divisional round. Dak is also 0-3 in the divisional round. Both had #1 seed teams and lost to inferior teams at home in the divisional round. Romo was fun to watch as a Dallas fan when he first came on in 2006 because this was coming off the black hole of Dallas QBs between Aikman and Romo. Coming out of the Dave Campo years. He was new, basically unheard of and hit the scene running. So much potential, especially his first full season as a starter, they got the 1 seed and looked to have a clear path to a Super Bowl. At this time, it had only been about a decade since their last SB appearance. Looked like Dallas could potentially build another era of winning but it never did and Dallas did nothing but spin in mediocrity his entire time here.
  11. I must have watched a different Romo era. We found an abundance of ways to lose with him as QB, just like with Dak. He might have had more "flash" but when it counted the most, he failed. Both the Romo and Dak eras are almost identical.
  12. For as bad as the defense started, this loss is all on the offense. Fumble inside the red zone and 3 straight drives to take a lead and nada. There will be very few games Dallas will have both sides of the ball making the most of their opportunities. 8-9 season upcoming, if that. No real playmakers on offense.
  13. Yeah don't put a spy in the middle for Hurts. Smart stuff
  14. Lamb is a fucking loser. Can't count on him to do shit. Dropped an easy one in that GB playoff game that set the tone.
×
×
  • Create New...