Kyle

If you quote me, it is directed at me, amigo. Just acknowledge you apply different standards to Clinton than Trump. It is not like it is not obvious. Nothing with the Clinton controversies had anything to do with sex - it was his lying about the myriad other scandals. The point is the same mouth breathers than think Russian hackers changed paper ballots are the same who have no problem with Secretary of State Clinton given big government contracts to Russians after they donated millions to the Clinton Foundation. That fact befuddles me ... and then I read a thread in Cloak Room and it makes sense..

Fair enough, but it was done under a Democrat appointed AG in response to one of Clinton's scandals. If you're honest, if John Ashcroft had done it, decent chance you have your tinfoil hat on.

There were allegations he raped several other women. Shockingly Slick Willie and Mrs. Willie have been teflon to #metoo.

That's one way to spin regulations enacted by a Democrat DOJ in light of the recent impeachment of said Democrat President. Tell me more how Russian hackers changed paper ballots.

So why are the mouth breathers constantly jacking off to Stormi Daniels? (Non jokingly, the question was one of rape not infidelity, but you know that ... expand your mind beyond CNN and Vox).

Dude. Seriously. Re-read my post a couple of times and try again.

No. Yes. He shoudl be banned. It is African-American Day that Happens to Be the Second Day of the Week, Not That There is Anything Wrong with That.

This. Didn't not understand why any UT folks get their panties in a wad about it. I like being in their heads.

I watch 80% for the great 80s nostalgia.

Agreed, but he was connected in all the right ways to the Establishment. It was not until it flipped #metoo that he finally got busted for representing Harvey Weinstein.

I largely agree with you, but objectively he was not impeached for porking an intern but for lying about it. Another example of often the cover-up is worse than the crime. It is funny to see the juxtaposition of the Clinton and Trump investigations. My friends who repeat the "impeached Clinton for a blow job" mantra want to impeach Trump over Storming Daniels. Similarly, the Democrats passed legislation limiting the release of these reports in response to the Starr Report now want everything in Mueller's released publicly. Have to love 'Murica.

Awesome.

That was just an excuse to show-off the WP.

I hope he at least has all that dough locked up in the tool box, although that's where the thieves go first.

Her voice deepened by gallons of cum swallowed every night.

Fair enough. Having worked adjacent to criminal attorneys, always said they preferred stupid jurors that they could manipulate (with that lawyer's swagger of unlimited confidence in their abilities of logic and persuasion ). Random rabbit ... no value judgement on the theoretical academic veracity of the following, but I do tend to fall back on (and I suspect many jurors might to ...): assuming the defendant had means, motive, and opportunity, some evidence pointing to guilt and no provable alibi, the fact there is zero evidence pointing to anyone else is compelling to me. At the end of the day (sorry no stats), I believe the overwhelming amount of violence (ex. robbery?) is committed by someone known to the victim. As an aside, I always chuckle at the paradox many of the so-called supporters of these pop culture cases have: many seem simultaneously to expect video of the suspect committing the crime in order for doubt to be reasonable while pointing the finger at alternative suspects based on virtually no evidence ... but I digress.

I loved the movie but had the same reaction. The guy has been a lifelong professional drunk ... felt like a stretch between that and guessing award shows have ushers but whatever. Still a great movie. No great movie critic here, but I thought most if it was fantastic. I always have loved Stephanie and Cooper. Didn't really get his voice, but again, whatever. Great movie that was both entertaining with great music and really gut punch of emotions. I had never seen or knew anything of the earlier versions, but told the old lady about 30' in: "this is not going to end well."

Between a couple of pop culture true crime stories and becoming an old fart, I have watched a lot more Datelines and 20/20s during the past few years. I'm regularly surprised at the dearth of evidence that convicts many people, particularly when there is a spousal or romantic relationship. Senility killing name recall, but watched one yesterday about a guy in New York convicted of killing his ex-wife and there was virtually no circumstantial, direct, or demonstrative evidence. Basically just the guys scorned ex said he was a jackass and asked her to help him kill his ex-wife for custody. Between that an means, motive, opportunity, jury convicted. (he probably did it but not sure I would have convicted)

One of the myriad things I found surprising ... those eyes made me think she would have found more satisfaction with a linebacker than a software engineer.

You should start a thread: "Running Thread of Blokes Hailing the Bobbies on Pollacks for No Reason" for those days the outrage tank is running low.

Seriously. I could have written this thread in my sleep the regard is so predictable.

Second. I agree with everything you said. The interwebs seems to turn emotional intelligence into projection.

The real question is can we be outraged and post it in the white people calling the cops thread?

He said "hands up don't shoot." At least according to the twitter. LOL.

Do you think there have only been one case of fake hate crimes and one false rape claim? Project much?