Jump to content

Asithappens

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    2,191
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Asithappens

  1. Were all going to be exposed to this. Stop the pollyanna thinking that you can protect yourself from exposure to the virus. Accept it. Embrace it. Pray to whatever god you want. My god is Stevie Ray Vaughan and he even has his own statue.
  2. I just watched (twice) Free Solo on Hulu. Words can't describe how good this movie is (imo) and the incredible feat that Alex Honnold accomplished. I was more in awe the second time I watched it than the first. It's like (Tommy Caldwell?) said, those who know a little bit about climbing (and not saying that I know a lot) think basically "no big deal", while those who know more think "what the fuck! this is crazy/amazing/whoa!". After this I watched "The Dawn Wall" (think it's on Netflix) about Tommy Caldwell and Kevin Jorgeson's ascent (is that the correct term?) of the Dawn Wall of El Capitan. These guys are not only incredible climbers they are also inspiring people. Mr. Caldwell and Mr. Honnold are amazing. Fyi, Alex and Sanni got engaged last Christmas. If you haven't seen this yet, please watch it. Get Hulu for a month if you have to. Just. Fucking. Amazing. Probably the single biggest physical/athletic feat in the history of mankind. Oh, and a shout out to Jimmy Chin (the guy who basically did the movie). He deserved his Oscar for this.
  3. Because the flu does kill more people? Are you talking about case rate fatality (CRF) or overall deaths? I think the flu does kill more people. I could be wrong, though.
  4. Lol, my thoughts exactly, loco. To call this the work of a "few", when in fact it was world-wide and involved many, many in the hierarchy, as well as many laity who initially blamed the victim, well, I respectfully decline to be bothered by his whining.
  5. I get your point, but think it's invalid here: the entire group of catholics deserve(d) to be shat upon. This isn't the thread for it, though.
  6. Hell, if the catholics didn't panic over the world-wide pedophile scandal I doubt they give much of a shit about this.
  7. A lot of resources (time and money) are being wasted in a futile attempt to stop every transmission of the virus. Put that effort into mash units or emergency gear/supplies. Every quarantine will be a fuck up. Every single one. Realize that and act accordingly.
  8. Who actually thinks that these parents really thought they were making donations to the school? If that's the case, go through the school, not a middleman. If that's the case, then why photoshop your kid's head onto a soccer/crew athlete? And maybe Singer did "tell" them that it was a donation, with a wink, wink. They are guilty as hell. Fuck them.
  9. Nothing in that contradicted my assertion of "very, very low (deaths) relative to other health issues". Maybe I missed it. There are, iirc, fewer than 3,000 deaths. I think you may have overlooked the "other health issues" part?
  10. Yeah, there is a lot of noise in the current data, what with the change of diagnostic criteria.
  11. I think you should care about how many people will die from tobacco use. Because if they are smoking, then there is second-hand smoke (or even third-hand, if you are of that ilk). People die from that. It's a slower death, to be sure, and doesn't raise the alarm bells like covid-19. I give a flying fuck about tobacco deaths b/c those deaths are preventable for the smoker and for those who live/are around the smoker. But that's an aside. I guess you and I will have to be on separate sides of these issues. *** edit to add *** Another thing, imo, to highlight the questionable statement that one doesn't give a flying fuck about tobacco deaths: use of tobacco is a public health concern, and can create comobidities that result in more deaths from things like, wait for it, covid-19. It's like they think this thing can be viewed in isolation from all other public health concerns. Imo, it cannot. If you don't give a fuck about tobacco deaths (for the reasons given) then you're a crackpot.
  12. Well yeah, but in the absence of a vaccine, it's only luck that 20% become infected rather than 50%. My point is that if there is enough of the virus to get 20% infected, then it's open season for everyone. By next year we're all gonna have been exposed. That assumption may be incorrect. But the genie is out of the bottle, imo. Now, if we have a vaccine, then everyone should jump on that train. I guess I'm saying that it's unrealistic to think that we can "contain" the virus for a year.
  13. Fuck the grandfather for basically killing his grandchild through his negligence. Fuck the grandfather for lying about it. Fuck the whole family for blaming the cruise ship and trying to get $ out of it.
  14. Well yeah, I see the problem. I also see how checking the temp of every single person coming over from the Pacific is a fool's errand (imo). You seem to think that if there are 100 people with the virus and we identify 90 of them, then we're good. What about the other 10 that we don't/can't get? I guess I'm fixating on your comment of it being negligent to not check the temp of every single person coming in from the Pacific. I couldn't disagree more.
  15. But it makes people feel better and gives the sense that we can control this. And that feeling is not a bad thing. Just don't use that feeling to make poor public health decisions.
  16. Right. From an analytical view, my interests (assuming I don't die from covid-19) are: 1. Risk analysis. Humans can exhibit some faulty thinking here (see Kahneman). We're not stupid, it's just how we are wired. One death in South Korea is "breaking news". Meanwhile, how many people will die from tobacco use? Today? 2. Marginal costs, which ties into 3. the psychology of "just doing something". Our fears are more assuaged if something is done, even if that something is ineffective, because we can more easily convince (fool?) ourselves that we have some control over events. Especially if we have kids. It puts our minds at ease, so that's a plus. Now, we all make assumptions and mine may be wrong. But imo the virus is already out there. We're not gonna stop it from spreading. Will it kill a lot? I hope not.
  17. Yeah, you know that seems like a good idea, but how effective is it? It's not. Checking the temps may be a well-intentioned effort but it's worthless. You can have the virus without having a temp. Imo, these steps just make us feel good about "doing something". It doesn't seem to matter that the steps are not effective. And what's a normal temp? What level triggers alarm? What about the mean/average human temp falling? How do you account for all this? Especially when if even one infected person gets through all these preventive steps have just become worthless? This whole thing is also an interesting study in marginal costs. How much are we willing to spend to eliminate every single chance of infection? (never mind that it can't be done) And as you can imagine, I don't think it was negligent to not take the temp of every single person who came over from the Pacific.
  18. And Spam. Don't forget Spam. Spam, Spam, Spam, bacon, Spam, eggs, and Spam is a great dish.
  19. I still think this is way overblown. I saw a "breaking news" tweet about one (yes, one) death in South Korea. Could this be a pandemic that kills millions? Maybe. It's an interesting view on risk analysis, imo. Most of the disruption (almost all) is due to the reaction/fear of the virus. As far as deaths go, the numbers are very, very low relative to other health issues. It's not surprising that elderly with comorbidities may die at a greater frequency. It's also an interesting study in how the internet feeds into this fear. Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe 50 million will die. Maybe I'll be one of them. I doubt it, though.
  20. See, this right here is why I'm a member of the Soft Earth Society. Accidents like this just wouldn't happen.
  21. Hot, cold, whatever. Warren has no chance of defeating Trump. Doing well in a meaningless debate counts for bupkis. Or is it bupkus?
  22. Do you know how much he's already spent to help Dems? A lot.
  23. I'll tell ya what, I've always wanted a Pres candidate to call for gubmint funding for sex-change operations for those poor souls in federal prison, and to have a trans teenager vet the future Sect'y of Education. God Bless Elizabeth Warren. Where would we be without her? /sarcasm off She's a brain dead fucking idiot. Bloomberg has the best chance of beating Trump. When will the Dems stop being the party of stupid? Probably never.
×
×
  • Create New...