Jump to content

Levi

Full Members
  • Posts

    2857
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Levi

  1. Sark said post game the first read was to Wingo.
  2. If you throw that ball in the snapshot taken then yes, a lot of bad can happen. Wingo was open right off the rub which is the read and it gives Wingo plenty of room to not get decapitated. It’s a bang-bang play that Arch needs to be quick with trigger on. The ball to Sanders, are you talking about the one against Oklahoma?
  3. That would only make sense if Arch wasn’t able to make long, on a rope throws. The drop to Endries and the rope to Wingo in the fourth are good examples of throws that he would not be able to make if he was injured. He was also over throwing WRs with zip on the ball as well. Like I said, a common theme of his bad throws was bad mechanics from the ground up. All of Arch’s good throws had good mechanics.
  4. Not really. The majority if not all of his bad throws were mechanically bad from the ground up. If someone has a hurt arm their foot work shouldn’t be impacted on the majority of their throws.
  5. Agreed. His throwing motion is already a little wonky and him trying to do the side arm stuff is going to highlight that even more. Philip Rivers’ throwing motion was akin to the mechanics of a trebuchet and any time he went off platform it looked awful. Arch isn’t as bad as Rivers though.
  6. He fell/tripped.
  7. Yeah, I understand exactly what the schematics are of the defense. My school did some cover 3 cloud. But my point was largely about the QB, and you put it more broadly of being able to execute longer drives. Arch clearly didn’t have the patience for it with a decent run game. During Sarks time here we’ve face good secondary’s and it largely hasn’t been an issue outside of a couple of teams that were better upfront, or a first time QB seeing it live. We had a good enough run game on Saturday to the point where if Arch isn’t so erratic, Texas walks away with a win and no talks about the Ohio st defensive scheme being a problem for Sark outside the redzone.
  8. Idk if it’s truly Sarks nemesis or if the QB needs to have plenty of live reps to actually understand how be successful against the defense. Like others have said, there were plenty of guys open and Arch didn’t see it or he made the wrong read. Feels like every QB has initially gone through this with Sark and he hasn’t found a way to better prepare them for it other than fail on game days.
  9. The Ohio st secondary was phenomenal with their communication and reads. It has been a minute since I’ve seen that type of execution from a secondary and it helps when they basically have Troy Polamalu jr out there. Georgia is maybe the only team that can replicate what the Ohio st secondary did. Arch still left some meat on the bone with a handful of plays. He just wasn’t seeing the field well at all. But Arch will be better going against this type of defense in the future especially if the run game holds up.
  10. The first play of the highlight was almost exactly like his first play yesterday.
  11. Nash Talks Texas on Twitter or YouTube. He’s pretty good and gets the vids up quick.
  12. Hadjar getting a podium with that tractor makes me happy.
  13. The 4th down run that ended the drive on the first series was an RPO. Arch clearly missed the read. He keeps it or pops it to Endries and it’s an easy first.
  14. If I remember correctly, on the second and goal play where they pulled Hutson, if Arch follows him to edge it’s an easy score. Thought it was weird that Arch just went directly to up the middle. I also don’t know the schematics of the play and if Hutson was supposed to go inside and it threw Arch off.
  15. I’ll be eager to see the QB schools all 22 of the game. There were a couple of plays where Arch was waiting for guys to get open and by the time he went to throw it was too late. Then there were times the WRs got no separation hardly at all. Howe’s point is true. On the flip side, Ohio st was pretty vanilla as well. Sayin just didn’t turn the ball over and executed what our defense gave him. The first td was aided by our dumb penalties and the second td to Tate was under thrown but he gave his guy a chance at least. I wasn’t a fan of the overall game plan from Sark but I’m struggling to see how it was the ultimate deciding factor in the loss. Our second deep redzone drive that ended up as a turn over on downs wasn’t called horribly. Better throw from Arch to Wingo at the minimum makes it first and goal. The fourth down play, Wingo was wide open on the slant and maybe even scores. I don’t know the read on that one tho.
  16. I keep seeing you say this and while I agree with about half of it, I think it’s a reasonable expectation for your QB to be able to hit the easy plays the that the defense gives you. The first drive alone there were 2 obvious plays where he simply did not execute. The last drive was kinda the opposite of Ewers in execution. No way Sark is calling that route to Endries with Ewers due his poor execution with that type of throw. But Arch can’t make a baddass throw like that and then turn around and fail on a simple flat route to Endries or the crosser to Wingo. We rightfully ridiculed Ewers with the same missed execution to Golden on a crucial play against Clemson. He needs to be money on those plays. Again, I agree that Sark had some wtf play calls.
  17. Arch couldn’t even recognize the easy RPO read on the first 4 down fail. What are we even doing here?
  18. It’s hard to get into a flow when the first play of the game has a wr schemed wide open and Arch throws it 5 yards in front of the wr. Arch couldn’t even throw a simple fire screen without it ending up as a 3yrd loss. Sarks shit starts in the redzone and that needs to be fixed asap.
  19. Outside of some pre-snap penalties from Baker making his first start, I thought they did really good considering how much shuffling they’ve been doing. Sucks about the last play but for the most part they were nasty in the run game to the tune of 166 yards rushing and gave Arch plenty of time. It was nice to see a qb step up into the pocket and not self sack. Now, if Arch can settle down and hit the easy throws then we might be cooking upfront as the season goes on.
  20. If one of my friends told me to look at a video they pulled up on the computer, and I could see the “live leak” logo in the top left corner, there was a 100% guarantee that is was going to be brutal to watch.
  21. What-if scenarios are pointless—they typically just serve to reinforce someone’s subjective opinion or argument.
  22. This is outstanding news. The pitching staff should be elite next year. Outside of our SS being meh defensively, Schloss and Co. got everything they needed out of the offseason portal/retention. It is still insane that we replaced a Buster Posey finalist with another Buster Posey finalist from the same year.
  23. Come on Hulk, hang on to that P3!!!
  24. That one stings a bit.
×
×
  • Create New...