sushihorn

Funny how once the fat boys up front are no longer able to shield them from Texas' physicality, the LSU secondary sure wants no part of the head on collisions being handed out by the Horns' skill guys.

Quien es mas macho!?!

LSU is at 53 plays defended after that TD. They are diving and faking injury they are so worn out.

18 plays into the drive. Over 50 total plays for LSU's defense. Fat SEC pussies look ready to tap out.

OK LSU. Your fatass DL are big and strong. Your back 7 doesn't seem to like bull in the ring very much...

Delpit misses the tackle on Duvrnay then throws the leg out. That's a 15 yard penalty.

Time for a strategic "injury" 9 plays into the drive. Fatass NT holds us a stress card.

LSU rushing 4, dropping 7 and NO SPY. Invitation to a delayed draw or late release screen.

Don't want to get into a wrestling match in a closet when they outweigh you. Challenge them to a footrace to the perimeter then stomp them when they're sucking wind.

Don't challenge these fatasses straight up until they are tired. Another 20 snaps and those are walk in TDs.

KI you don't look around until the ball is in your hands.

Menopause is a form of transcendence...

Clemson had 38 offensive plays in the first half despite aggy attempts to slow the game down. They probably cross the event horizon (45-50 snaps) for Fatball(TM) fatigue during the opening drive of the second half. Jimbo was draining the clock like he was running Army's offense but still exhausted his own defense.

Probably. I think you have to acknowledge that it will be a lot faster and easier to kill the SEC superiority myth if we can also elevate the image of the Big XII in any comparison.

In principle I agree. Unfortunately the perception affects recruiting. Every year we see at least a dozen good recruits go to trash programs because they "wanted to play in the SEC" - especially defensive players. Time to let them know that NOBODY plays harder hitting defense than TEXAS. It wouldn't hurt to highlight the fact that LSU is trying desperately to become a knock off of a Big XII offense either.

LSU line play:

For too long the national image of the Big XII has been defined by Oklahoma as the most successful program in the conference. Their offense generated points and yards by the ton but their defense was average at best and often terrible. Neither unit impressed with their physicality or toughness. Okie is THE reason the average fan thinks the Big XII is soft. Now it the time for a changing of the guard. We all know that Patterson has played tough D at TCU for many years but they were never nationally prominent for long enough to impinge on the public consciousness. Then Tom Herman and Todd Orlando joined the Big XII. Texas is the program with the national profile to change people's perception of what the conference is all about. Those men have brought toughness on both sides of the ball with a hard nosed OL and QB plus a defense that can fly and HIT. Based on TV and internet talking heads, the mob still thinks Texas is soft. They are wrong. We know that's not true and hasn't been true for 3 years. Let's show them that new reality today in a way that is undeniable. From the first play, let 'em know what they signed up for.

Not really. Texas has question marks at TE, CB2, LB3 and 4 and RB depth. LSU has questions at 3-4 OL positions, TE, 2 WR positions and a true freshman at CB2. True but many of the offensive returners are mediocre to below average. The defense is very good and the quality depth should easily compensate for White, if not Williams. The OL on the other hand wasn't that good last year and continued to run block poorly against GA So. Other than Jefferson the WRs weren't special last season either. Texas will miss Omenihu, Boyd (at times) and Gary Johnson. The 2 other DL replacements are upgrades vs Nelson and Hager. Ossai and Foster started in the Sugar Bowl, kicked ass and continued to do so this year. They're not really new. Keep in mind that LSU has recruited at a high level for years. Replacing equal level talent with less experience can be a downgrade. Texas is replacing top 15-20 level talent with top 3 talent from the last 2 classes. There is a lot of room for upgrading ability while losing experience with the net being a plus for us.

Texas 31 - Corndogs 19

How about some old school kung fu shit? Cowering Tiger, Raging Bull or Sam Answers the Call

Just trot out Dinesh Patel and their status as swamp aggy will be enshrined permanently.

Bama of course...

For any of you LSU fans wondering why the Texas fanbase is singularly unimpressed with 55 points in a blowout some history is in order. LSU is trying to introduce spread concepts. We see plenty of such teams and we see one every year that LSU looks to be emulating closely with the short game. Every year that team piles up points against scrub opponents then does little to nothing in the regular season. 2018: 77-0 in game 2. Final record 5-7. 2017: 56-10 opener. 6-7 finish. 2016: 69-17 opener. 5-7 2015: 69-20 game 2. 7-6 2014: 42-35 game 1 was an omen of bad things; 4-8 overall 2013: 61-13 game 2. Ended 8-5 but 4-5 in conference. I could go on with another 12 years of this stuff. That team is Texas Tech - one of the earliest adopters of passing-based spread concepts. We don't think, we KNOW that blowing out bad teams with that style of offense proves only that you don't completely suck. And we have YEARS of data to back that up. No offense to LSU but we have seen that the hype from those offensive explosions rarely translates against better teams.

Chaisson has a few skins on the wall. Emery and the freshman CB are still all potential. Every Longhorn should remember what DKR said about potential.