Keef

I mean, Shaq was allowed to call himself 320 for years, so why the hell not, sure Sydir, you’re 340.

Irrational expectations fueled by west Texas oil money - what could possibly go wrong!

Just an amazing play all around and the stiff arm might not be the most impressive part. He drove the guard back five yards which flushed Burrow into the arms of Simmons. He then had the presence of mind to pick pocket Burrow before he hit the turf. He was the highest graded defender for the Titans on Sunday and looks like a franchise player for them.

I agree with this 100%. There's definitely some overreacting and folks misidentifying shit going on, but there's also clearly something going on in the background they aren't telling the public (could be benign, could be with good intentions, could be totally prosaic, etc.).

I’m just quoting what they said. Sounds like you heard what you want to hear, so that’s the important thing.

I would encourage you to, as you say, do your own research and review the actual WSJ reporting on the Langely drones. Seems very unlikely that the feds, so accustomed to nabbing trespassers as you rightly point out, would struggle for weeks over one of our most sensitive bases.

They have said that is their initial assessment and that they’re investigating. But they have no idea what it is. Which is why a lot of the politicians on both sides of the aisle are pissed.

Of course it’s considered. My only point is that it shouldn’t be the only thing considered, especially with the incursions on our military installations.

I have not seen a single person on this thread suggesting it is aliens. And if you're a normal person flying the drones illegally, why would you keep the lights on either? I think the bottom line is that it doesn't make a ton of sense to fly drones with blinking lights over a populated area unless you (i) are doing it intentionally and don't care or don't think you'll be caught or (ii) you aren't sophisticated, in which case, why are we struggling to put a stop this? Blinking lights don't exclude much of anything.

Where have I do that? What I have said is civlian reports + military reports + people receiving classified reports and saying there is something there lends me to think that, more likely than not, there is more to the story here. You mean like the Wall Street Journal (admittedly not liberal, but a serious news outlet), the BBC, the New York Times, and CNN? Those liberal rags? And aren't you relying on...well, feelings? You saw it reported on Fox, and now assume that everyone who treats it seriously is a Fox News nut?

Do you want me to go through and reiterate all of my very detailed posts on this thread? And why is this political? Because I agree with Brisket on pretty much every political item he posts.

No fucker, I just believe that posters on a football message board with an avatar of penis eating a penis are equally fallible as people in New Jersey (although I acknowledge it’s close).

Look I think we're just going to have to agree to disagree. I've given my thoughts and you've given yours.

There's plenty of examples of our military doing just that on incursions in our airspace. And if it is our drones, isn't that cause for concern? What the fuck are they doing with those drones and why are they using them at night? What on earth were they doing at Langely? Look, I generally agree with pretty much everything you post on this board, but these are either ours or someone else's, and if they are ours, wtf is going on, and if they're someone else's why aren't we doing something about it? Because we're presently looking pretty impotent. Where I personally get annoyed is the condescending "it's clearly mass dilusion!" crowd, posted by a bunch of folks who I am quite confident are not clinical psychologists. And on the contrary, occam's razor signifies that the most likely event is probably the answer. I'd posit that hundreds of reports, many from qualified witnesses like pilots, military etc., plus corraborating statements from people who have received classified briefings plus leaked statements from the military regarding incursions in Langely probably signifies they're seeing something. Occam's Razor lends me to support that rather than a bunch of wannabe scientists (or even worse, lawyers! 😃) reading Mick West on Twitter and telling everyone how stupid they are.

I genuinely don't understand the debunkers flocking to this story. Unknown drone traffic harrasses our mlitary bases and shuts down runways at aiports, and we've arrested chinese nationals in this country legally for using drones to spy on our military installations. At first these idiots were just misidentifying the same airplanes landing at the same airport that has been going on for years. Oh wait, there ARE some drones? Well of course there are a couple. That's to be expected. People on both sides are concerned and demanding answers. This isn't pizza-gate, and posting self congratulatory videos of obvious fakes isn't impressive or convincing. Cherry picking a few morons on Twitter is incredibly easy and helps absolutely no one. Is it a case of mass panic? I'd be more inclined to entertain that if there weren't so many reports of this impacting military installations, both domestic and abroad. I think there's a very real possibility we're witnesses the deployment of new drone tech. I understand being skeptic, but I'm inclined to give the benefit of the doubt to state governors and others who have received confidential information expressing concern, especially when coupled with the volumes of witness testimony (which you can absolutely toss out 80%+ of, but it's the 20% everyone is interested in). But I get that a few of you read a couple of twitter threads and now feel resolute in your views. Oh, and fuck Donald Trump.