Jump to content

Tex-19

Burnt Ends
  • Posts

    3835
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Tex-19

  1. Prob not as a True Freshmen, I'd agree with you. But definitely could in a year or two. (Although actually Bama's OL wasn't that great last year and they took a transfer LT from freaking Vandy to shore it up)
  2. Lol ok Ketch, sure, one practice completely flipped the script of the QB battle. Right.
  3. Interesting point. I do recall when Sark was hired, some people mentioned that he studied up on the 9.95ers, and we pretty often saw him icing FCB with short responses in pressers.
  4. Woooowwww didn't see this coming today. Lol at the 9.95ers (esp OB) with the major whiff
  5. It's funny how UT fans forget that VY redshirted Year 1, then lost out to Chance Mock to start his RS FR year, then ended up with a 6:7 TD:INT ratio that year, was still an iffy passer in Year 3, before finally going Superman mode late that season and all of Year 4. But oh no Ewers isn't ready in game 1 of year 1..
  6. He'll probably get closer to 40% snaps vs ULM although should be a lot of garbage time. He may even get a bunch of snaps against Bama if it gets ugly. And if Card struggles against Bama (many QBs do), Sark likely makes the switch for UTSA.
  7. Interesting. So yeah of course there have been a few, but not many at all and almost none of the guys who come to mind as recent elite QBs. I actually think there is genuine risk to throwing QBs to the wolves too soon. It's such a mental position that killing their confidence can have lasting effects that far outweigh the game experience.
  8. Other than the open practice, I haven't seen a single practice report all week. Seems like they were told to shut up.
  9. Sam didn't start game 1. Buechele did. Maryland game.
  10. Yeah almost no QBs are ready day 1. I can't name one week 1 true freshman starting QB in the last 10 years, for any school. Lawrence was the closest because he split playing time early on but he didn't actually start until week 5. But lol, Arch isn't reclassifying this late and he'd have to graduate HS so it's not like he can just wake up and do it.
  11. This is kinda my fear in a way. If Ewers doesn't win the job early in the year, what does Arch think? One redshirt year is fine but I doubt he wants 2. Although 3 years of Ewers would obviously be nice so maybe I shouldn't worry about that..
  12. People on this board handwring about 3-star recruits that won't be on campus for a year. Handwringing about the starting QB is the most sane things happening here.
  13. To play devils advocate, keeping the donors happy now has a pretty direct correlation with the roster/winning. It was counterproductive before NIL but the game has changed.
  14. Isn't it worse long-term if you start Ewers before he's ready, he struggles mightily, and you have to switch to Card? Now you're rolling with Card all year or flip flopping like last year. Worst case scenario. The reverse situation is you start with Card and then either A) he struggles and you can roll with Ewers all year without any more back and forth, or B) Card balls out which solves the problem. Not really. Better than last year? Sure. Pretty good? Doubtful
  15. The 9.95 narrative has changed very suddenly. Feels like the staff doing some intentional messaging. As he likes to say, @closetojumping might want to light his cigarette.. I still think Ewers starts game 3.
  16. Alright I watched the little 7-7 portion and Card definitely did look better in that. Ewers almost looked like he wasn't trying, kinda odd. So my final recap - Card looked good in 7-7, bad in 11-11. Ewers looked bad in 7-7, good in 11-11.
  17. I didn't watch the 7-7 but idk what he's talking about for the 11-11. Ewers looked way better.
  18. Just watched the 11-11. Would add a couple qualitative things to this: Ewers had another long TD pass dropped by Worthy (should've been an easy catch). Card's tipped ball INT could've been caught but it was a short route that was probably thrown a little too hard. Another one of his INTs was really a clear sack and he just kinda threw it up afterwards. I probably wouldn't really count that one. Overall Ewers seemed clearly better to me. But I know that's just one short practice worth of 11 on 11 only.
  19. True on them keeping suspense for clicks. But you're talking about one vanilla open practice - the decision isn't going to be based off that. And look, I hope it's Quinn too but I also understand why it might not be. He's a Freshman, they almost never start week 1. In fact, when he first committed here my assumption was that he'd become the starter after Bama (so as to not feed him to the wolves before he's ready). He'll get a lot of snaps vs ULM either way so the biggest difference is Bama and tbh it might be better to not subject him to that trauma
  20. Sorry I meant Card for two games then switch is like what Clemson did. Kelly Bryant started the first 2-4 games (idk) for them although with Lawrence getting real snaps even in that close A&M game. Game 3 or 4 they flipped it.
  21. Ruh roh, sure seems like the 9.95ers are preparing us for it to be Card. For all the shit we give FCB, he does tend to break a lot of the official news. At this point, wouldn't be surprised if it's Card for two games, then Ewers. Kinda like what Clemson did with Trevor Lawrence. But the only way Card goes beyond that is if he is balling out (which wouldn't be a bad thing).
  22. Like others, I disagree. He didn't reclassify until August, then spent the season as 4th/3rd string which I assume means very few reps during the season. Plus he missed a year of actual starting experience in high school. Honestly might have even be worse for development than just playing his senior year. Plus, one of the biggest differences about being a "redshirt" freshman is the extra year learning the system. Obviously he doesn't have that advantage.
  23. Does anyone else think it's kinda crazy how high the national expectations are for Ewers this soon? As others have said, he's basically a true freshman. I didn't hear a peep when Bryce Young redshirted (granted, Mac Jones was very good). No one expects Weigman or Klubnik to start at any point this season. Yet for some reason, it's a huge failure if Ewers isn't ready week 1? In fact, I can't even name a single true freshman QB who started week 1. Not Lawrence, not Fields, not Rattler, not Caleb, etc. I know, I know, Ewers isn't technically a true freshman. But just like all true freshman, he's played 4 seasons of football since he entered high school and like them, he's learning a new system this year. Being a redshirt typically means you had a year to learn the playbook. It also typically means you had a Senior season as a starter in HS. Not the case here. Anyway, thanks for attending my ted talk.
  24. So to recap the reports on the QBs from yesterday: Jeff Howe - Ewers slightly better OB - Totally even IT - Card more consistent, Ewers better deep. Pretty even overall. Nahlin still leans to Ewers being the eventual starter but neither would be surprised by anything. Fans - all saying Ewers better (probably some bias there) From Monday: Hookah Horn - Ewers had a great day No one else reported anything
×
×
  • Create New...