Jump to content

Tex-19

Burnt Ends
  • Posts

    4024
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Tex-19

  1. Probably not but Venables seems like the type to say fuck it so who knows
  2. So Sark said Ewers was "available" yesterday. Has he said that in previous weeks? Wondering if that means anything or just more misdirection
  3. Bryce Young might be out. Our line could swing a lot based on both Ewers and Gabriel status
  4. I read something that SC injuries can be legit health concerns because it's near the heart. Not sure how true, but that would warrant a conservative approach
  5. OUs defense looks comically bad. They aren't coming within 5 yards of the runners or WRs for TCU
  6. We shall see. Long season ahead. The defense has definitely improved so far and the Tech outcome is skewed by the 4th downs. The yards per play stats were still quite good in that game. I won't be surprised if the defense ends up having a solid year.
  7. Yep. Only way Sark gets fired is a 3-win season. Maybe 4. Otherwise gotta give him next year with Ewers, the more experienced stud OLs, and Worthy/Neyor back. Especially with the Ewers injury (somewhat legit) excuse.
  8. I'll be honest, I'm actually less worried about the defense than I am about overall 2nd half performance. In Sark's 9 losses, 5 had halftime leads (1 tied - Bama). On the flip side, no halftime comeback wins. Easy to blame the defense but if the offense doesn't go limp in 2H, we still beat OU and OSU last year plus now Tech.
  9. He's been planning to take these visits the whole time. It's a bidding war.
  10. Quinn was Muschamp's DC at Florida for a while
  11. I thought the sequence was Muschamp, Lanning, Dan Quinn, then PK. Maybe Odom in there somewhere too
  12. Wasn't Arnett the guy that interviewed at LSU or somewhere else and supposedly had an all-time terrible interview?
  13. Yep, sounds like our staff/boosters better have their heads on a swivel
  14. JT needs to work on his blocking too. He whiffed on the Bijan fumble and several other plays
  15. 1. Offense played well enough to win, but they still get some blame for the 2nd half. 1 more TD or even just keeping the defense off the field longer would have been enough. 2. Yep. Pass pro is better than I expected though, run blocking way worse, but the youth is a big part of that. Bright future still. Wonder if we see Devon Campbell soon bc Hutson seems like the weakest link right now just by naked eye. 5. Exactly. Tech chose a high risk strategy and it worked out for them. That strategy could've easily led to a blowout win for us. The one caveat imo is that the defense allowed them to set up a bunch of makeable 4th downs. A lot of 4th and 2/3/4s from around midfield. This is surprising to read. Felt like we were too conservative watching it live. But I haven't broken it down.
  16. Anyone ask him why the offense only managed 1 TD in the second half after cruising in the first? And why that's happened like 6 times in his Texas tenure?
  17. Lol at these Tech accounts posting that like crazy trying to make Texas look bad, when now it turns out all they did was show another UT player getting shoved and then acting with class by apologizing to the girl
  18. Exactly. Nebraska had success in the portal too after going 3-9 in like year 4 of Frost era
  19. Tech only lost by 13 to a top 10 team on the road. They also whipped Miss St. in their bowl game last year. Not saying the loss is ok but maybe they aren't as bad as you think?
  20. Wow I did not expect Miss St to be favored over ATM
  21. It will be interesting to see how much winning impacts recruiting in the new NIL era nationwide. NFL free agents often don't give a shit about a team's record, they go for the biggest contract with the Jaguars or whoever. We could be entering an all-business era of college football where NIL and NFL development matter a lot more than a team's record.
×
×
  • Create New...