Nobody cares about who does and doesn't get my seal of approval. I'm not particularly pro RT or anti RT. I just want Texas to hire the best basketball coach they can to lead the program. RT is somewhere on the list of realistic candidates, and the strengths and weaknesses of his fitness for the position have been discussed ad nauseum.
To answer your question directly - there is nothing that RT can do in this tournament that will make me feel like he is a slam dunk hire. As i wrote in my earlier post, in my mind there is a big difference between taking over a team full of upperclassmen and super seniors and guiding the team and building/maintaining a program. RT is absolutely crushing it in leading this team, and that is most definitely a big part of the job and he deserves a lot of credit. But in my mind some folks are treating performance at a single tournament as tantamount to being qualified to lead a program. I don't agree.
Some things are factual and beyond dispute. RT was a pedestrian head coach at Fresno and UTEP. Reasonable minds can reach different conclusions on how to interpret that. Some say success at leading smaller programs is the best way of demonstrating the ability to successfully lead bigger programs. Others make the argument that recruiting to smaller programs is more difficult, and coaching with fewer resources doesn't let someone address weaknesses. Getting to coach at a school like Texas with access to elite talent and more resources, some people have skills to succeed in that environment where they couldn't in the smaller school environment. I tend to side with the former, but I can't say the latter is impossible.
I do not think RT is the worst possibility. My opinion on hiring RT is contingent on what other candidates are out there. If, for instance, Texas passed on hiring Donovan because RT made a final four, I would consider that a mistake. I have absolutely no idea whether Donovan (or whoever else clear upgrade coach) is a realistic candidate. I have come around to the position that keeping RT is preferable to hiring someone who is not a slam dunk upgrade. There are some very real benefits to recruiting continuity and program stability, but I would still be concerned for the Peter principle, where RT's ceiling is really great assistant but isn't a top guy (a la Mark Adams, Barry Switzer, etc). I am also mindful of the track record of assistants stepping into head coaching roles without proving it as a head coach elsewhere.
I will say my enthusiasm for a RT hire would be higher if he maintained Donewald. I do think Donewald has been a very large part of the success at Texas. Obviously RT did not have assistants at the level of Donewald at his prior stops, and a great head coach has assistants who are strong where the head coach is weaker. I'd have more confidence in the RT/Donewald pairing. I'd want to know if that pairing could continue in the future. If not, I would consider it an open question if RT was good at hiring assistants.
Regardless of my opinion/concerns, it looks like RT will be hired. I'll be 100% in his corner if/when that happens. I'm enjoying the heck out of this run and hope it is a regular occurrence in the years to come.