TotallyLegit

Wonderlick my balls, capitan

Dough or doughnut. And also fries.

Geoff Ketchum after announcing a commitment before the recruit does.

To be fair, that's more of a sack than some of us on surly have.

Not to be confused with the stalwart East Lansing beat writer, Doody Sheetz.

If any of you had read between the lines on @Funk Doctor Spock's posts as I did, you'd have put Justus Terry in the calculator earlier this week.

Harbaugh knew the kid was a gamer and got him a cake shaped like Stranglethorn Vale

Our average is higher than Georgia's, so without looking into it, I would assume that at least one of the following is true: Our 5-stars are better than their 5-stars Our 4-stars are better than their 4-stars Our 3-stars are better than their 3-stars Even if our average weren't higher, 247, and maybe on3 too, weights the contribution of each recruit toward the team class score based not just on the recruit's rating but also on the recruit's rank among the recruits in that team's class. i.e., each recruit after the best recruit in the team's class contributes a smaller percentage of their rating to the team class score. e.g., on 247, Jonah Williams contributes 98 * 1 = 98 points to our class score. Kaliq Lockett contributes 98 * some number less than 1, Michael Terry III contributes 98 * some multiplier which is less than Kaliq Lockett's multiplier, and so on. The upshot of this is that, assuming two teams with an equal average, the recruiting sites consider the team composed of players rated 100 or 80 to be better than a team composed entirely of players rated 90. How closely this reflects the reality of the relationship between roster construction and success on the field is beyond me. @irishtexan

Missed an opportunity for a Yoda reference, you have.

Or at the very least, pipe-brandishing++

Maybe even a 6--;

I am 110% sure Ewers can make that exact same throw next week.

Tale as old as time