Jump to content

TotallyLegit

Full Members
  • Posts

    1325
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by TotallyLegit

  1. Personally, Cam Skattebo kind of reminds me of Toby Gerhart because I’m racist.
  2. This is actually a reasonable take. Consider the touchdown to Helm against Clemson. We have a strong tendency to run quick screens from empty, so when the safety saw the RB motion to empty with no WR to his side of the field, he thought the same thing. Tendencies can absolutely be a good thing if you go against them effectively as well.
  3. An ASU girl who realizes that those two words rhyme is marriage material.
  4. Geoff Ketchum after announcing a commitment before the recruit does.
  5. To be fair, that's more of a sack than some of us on surly have.
  6. Not to be confused with the stalwart East Lansing beat writer, Doody Sheetz.
  7. If any of you had read between the lines on @Funk Doctor Spock's posts as I did, you'd have put Justus Terry in the calculator earlier this week.
  8. Harbaugh knew the kid was a gamer and got him a cake shaped like Stranglethorn Vale
  9. Our average is higher than Georgia's, so without looking into it, I would assume that at least one of the following is true: Our 5-stars are better than their 5-stars Our 4-stars are better than their 4-stars Our 3-stars are better than their 3-stars Even if our average weren't higher, 247, and maybe on3 too, weights the contribution of each recruit toward the team class score based not just on the recruit's rating but also on the recruit's rank among the recruits in that team's class. i.e., each recruit after the best recruit in the team's class contributes a smaller percentage of their rating to the team class score. e.g., on 247, Jonah Williams contributes 98 * 1 = 98 points to our class score. Kaliq Lockett contributes 98 * some number less than 1, Michael Terry III contributes 98 * some multiplier which is less than Kaliq Lockett's multiplier, and so on. The upshot of this is that, assuming two teams with an equal average, the recruiting sites consider the team composed of players rated 100 or 80 to be better than a team composed entirely of players rated 90. How closely this reflects the reality of the relationship between roster construction and success on the field is beyond me. @irishtexan
  10. I am 110% sure Ewers can make that exact same throw next week.
  11. That was the baddest assest truck stick I've ever seen.
×
×
  • Create New...