Jump to content

TotallyLegit

Full Members
  • Posts

    1355
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by TotallyLegit

  1. Does Alex Smith not have any eligibility left?
  2. @closetojumping is wrong. The Cloak Room is not to the right.
  3. If you walk out of practice whenever you want, you're put at 3rd on the depth chart even if nobody is 2nd. Use marijuana or any other Schedule 1 controlled substance in the locker room, and you're looking at 4th. That's just the kind of disciplinarian Jimbo is.
  4. Rule 4 - Section 30 . Article 2 To establish or maintain legal rebounding position, a player shall not: b. Extend either or both arms or elbows, fully or partially, in a position other than vertical so that the freedom of movement of an opponent is hindered when contact with any of these body parts occurs. d. Violate the principle of verticality (a player is entitled to his/her space that is occupied, plus all vertical space above that player). Omier committed a foul in two different ways before Cunningham could commit a foul. The first action occurred when Omier pushed Cunningham into the restricted area. Not only was his second action a foul despite endangering himself more than Cunningham, but he endangered himself because it was a foul. If he had merely jumped vertically in his own vertical space rather than into Cunningham's vertical space, he would have fallen more safely, if at all. This seems like a clear example of refs misapplying the rules because they don't want to catch heat for calling a foul on the player who is more endangered, even if he put himself in that danger. To those arguing, "the refs always call it this way", then they're always calling it wrong. Also, read some David Hume.
  5. Have we considered getting some sort of nurse NIL collective together? Maybe like a "get your Ear Nose n Throat checked by an End Nose or Tackle!" kinda deal? There's gotta be at least 9 figures in something like that.
  6. He likes to tell us about a&m
  7. I feel REAL bad for the teams in the bottom left quadrant
  8. Assuming you're taking the formation as a given and you mean like an RPO look, I agree, this could be a good call. I think K-State was in man coverage with #2 and #29 blitzing. Sending Sanders to the opposite flat and could have allowed us to option off #29.
  9. But this guy calls it pin & pull, so maybe I'm just being a pedantic asshole.
  10. https://www.surlyhorns.com/board/topic/22304-this-is-who-steve-sarkisian-is/?do=findComment&comment=4794650
  11. Nine-man box aside, I'm not sure it was a terrible call so much as a call that K-State made sure to not allow to succeed in the second half, since our longest play of the game came on this call in the first half, and the formation and short motion by Sanders are very conspicuous. Though I'd prefer counter or split zone if they're going to overload the side that our TE is on. It's also curious that we had 11 personnel out there when we pretty clearly wanted to run the ball. Once K-State overloaded the TE side, our options for checking to another run were somewhat limited.
  12. Except AJ Milwee knows that it's not pin and pull...
  13. Lack of genetic diversity will do that
  14. I woulda gone with Wigger
  15. This is actually crack toss sweep, not pin and pull, so the blocking is slightly different. In hindsight, Sanders probably should have cracked #2 instead of the 5-tech once he became the end man on the line of scrimmage, but I don't know how the 5-tech would have then been handled. It's also interesting that it looks like Whittington initially tried to get to #2. This was also the play Bijan got his longest run of the game on, but mirrored on the other hash, and Sanders aligned wider after his short motion, which allowed him to get a better block.
  16. If we win this game, I'm gonna spray it everywhere
  17. He's been soldiering on through some minor wear and tear and some dings typical of a hard-nosed SEC player. He also has 29 chromosomes
  18. This plan jives well with my social anxiety
×
×
  • Create New...