Here's more for everyone's consideration around the notions of development and evaluation.
Michigan's recruiting classes ranked by OTF from 2018-2023 (this is the reasonable period in which a player could be expected to have contributed to the Michigan title run in 2023):
2018 - 28
2019 - 7
2020 - 10
2021 - 15
2022 - 9
2023 - 18
Now, here's Texas A&M in that same stretch:
2018 - 14
2019 - 4
2020 - 6
2021 - 8
2022 - 1
2023 - 15
Now, where does the evaluation value end and the development value begin? I don't know. Either Michigan just evaluated better than damned near everyone else, including the gurus, or they developed better than everyone else, or both. I lean more towards development but would give it a 40/60 split in my head. They kicked ass either way.
Measured against that, ATM is probably the biggest failure at evaluation, development or both in the entire country among the P4 schools. Elko was there for 4 years of that and I'll argue evidence of his failures at one or both are clear in looking at the draft results. Jaylon Jones and Demarvion Leal were 5 star recruits who were not drafted to that pedigree. Those are guys actually drafted from their defense following these periods, which is saying something for ATM. A lot of their highly ranked guys flatly bombed.
So, do we have justification to trust the coaches? Or should we worry about ATM-esque results? I think at most places outside of DB, you're okay leaning towards trusting the coaches right now.