Enfield

You electoral college at all, Bro?

Found them... https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/us/elections/polls.html

What did the poll numbers look like right before the 2016 election?

Sorry. I’ve been busy negotiating a book deal with ABC on some dirt I have. Time is of the essence so they have to act quick!

PM Christopher Steele. He has the going rate.

By itself, sure. As it relates to msNBC, CNN, Etc..... they are just countering the bias from the other side.

So you don’t really care that Russia is influencing our elections? You only care about how they do it? Ok.

Sure.. no bad faith here. Book deal in return for dirt? Sure! No problem. We will send over a book guarantee ASAP!! While we get this going let me share with the campaign that is going to benefit so they can get ready to maximize!!! Freelance journalist Michael Smith had emailed Mapes, asking, "What if there was a person who might have some information that could possibly change the momentum of an election but we needed to get an ASAP book deal to help get us the information?" Mapes replied, "that looks good, hypothetically speaking of course."[130] The Thornburgh–Boccardi report found that Mapes' contact with Kerry adviser Joe Lockhart was "highly inappropriate", and that it "crossed the line as, at a minimum, it gave the appearance of a political bias and could have been perceived as a news organizations' assisting a campaign as opposed to reporting on a story";[114] however, the Panel did not "find a basis to accuse those who investigated, produced, vetted or aired the Segment of having a political bias".[131] In a later interview with The Washington Post, when asked about the issue of political bias, review panel member Louis Boccardi said "bias is a hard thing to prove".[132] The panel concluded that the problems occurred "primarily because of a rush to air that overwhelmed the proper application of the CBS News Standards"

Are you saying the Steele Dossier has grounds to stand on? Please share what credibility a paid for opposition research file has, please.

Care to contradict anything I wrote there?

If we want to broaden the impact of dirt, fake dirt, to influence an election, just look at what we do here in America. Dan Rather takes total made up bullshit documents and legitimizes them to the entire country about a candidates military record. He has an absolute agenda in publishing it. He gets no jail time, no congressional inquiry, nothing. People like him are just as dangerous, if not more so, than the Russians are influencing an election.

Ask Christopher Steele what the going rate is.

I agree. The precedence is to use it convince a court to allow your administration to surveil your opponents campaign. He should take full advantage of that just like Obama administrators did. As well, he should do just like what was done to him. Provide the dirt to the FBI but also get it out in the press like the Steele Dossier was.

2020 version is Steele... Trump is told that Joe Biden’s son worked with Russians. Russians also say the have dirt on Biden from hotel stays in Russia. Pro-Trump FBI agents submit for warrants. Trump secretly surveil on Biden campaign. We cool with this?

The FBI did two things with it. Deemed it unverified and also used it to obtain FISA warrants to surveil a campaign. Do suggest Trump should do the same against his opponents during this election cycle?