so it seems perhaps you have come full circle.
first, i am glad that you are no longer saying that the data is skewed because of quantum of population differences. that is encouraging.
i believe this whole thing started with you professing your erotic commitment to our country's fetish with pew pews. someone made the point that this cultural phenomenon has led to insanely exacerbated violence perpetrated on the united states population at the hands of firearms relative to other civilized countries in the world.
you then said hey, there's violence in other places as well, look at the u.k. and their stabbings.
then we had a long tangent on statistics and per capita and population and white people and a whole bunch of other complete and utter bullshit.
and now, it seems, that you are saying that we can't compare the united states violence due to firearms to other civilized countries because we have a culture that loves firearms and the other countries do not.
now, i am no tolerant genius like yourself...but perhaps you could go ahead and make that last connection between those last two dots that bring it full circle.
in case you can't, it would seem that you agree that our country's fetish with guns has created a unique, some might say even difficult to compare, environment with overwhelmingly tragic outcomes relative to the rest of western civilization and that it is your argument that it is SO UNIQUE, in fact, that it is not even reasonable to compare our culture with others.
good talk.