Jump to content

DFW Horn

Full Members
  • Posts

    3930
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by DFW Horn

  1. 2 minutes ago, Al_4_ISU said:

    I gotta think the “not done” RE the Big 10 is ND and someone out of the ACC and they’ll be waiting for that GOR to go

    ND is who the Big 10 has always wanted. If they had joined in 2010, we probably still have 6 BCS conferences and no playoffs.

    Would USC and UCLA prefer to add west coast "travel partners" to the B1G? Or leave them to compete for the scraps with no place at the big boys' table?

  2. 14 minutes ago, Ignatius said:

    I thought that before I lived there for a few years, but what I found was that a shitload of New Yorkers are really into college football but went to smaller schools in the region who don’t play big time football. They’re into the big games of the week but don’t really have an allegiance to a particular team, definitely not Syracuse which might as well be in Buffalo, and sure as fuck not New Jersey-ass Rutgers….

    So, they're degenerate gamblers who like to bet on CFB?

  3. 8 minutes ago, hawkfan said:

    Question for Texas fans - knowing that the B1G can probably now take their pick of the remaining PAC schools, would you prefer a B1G with USC/UCLA/Oregon/Washington or the SEC?  Not saying this is in the cards or anything, but reset the board and assume you hadn't announced your intent to join the SEC - would you prefer the SEC or 20 School B1G + USC/UCLA/Oregon/Washington (and OU/UT)?

    SEC

    I was never interested in joining the Rust Belt or Left Coast leagues. Easier travel, big & passionate fan bases. Better BBQ

    • Hook 'Em 4
  4. 3 minutes ago, maninblack said:

    The 6 schools I listed going to the P12 makes more money than adding a few schools from the P12 to the bastardized B12.

    If I'm a bigger name brand in the B12 I'd much rather be associated with the schools in the west than who the B12 added.

    Who are the "bigger name brands" worth poaching in the Big 12?

    KU, OSU, and Tech?

  5. 2 minutes ago, PencilPusher said:

    What is the SEC response to this? Guess the Mouse will have a say in that but is there a move? Does there really need to be? In the words of the great mensch Linda Richmond, "Talk amongst yourselves!"

     

    ESPN has the ACC broadcast rights, so the Mouse doesn't have to do anything now.

  6. 1 minute ago, Laxtonto said:

    Even without those 2 you are looking at a much better set of peers academically and if we are running towards the super conference era there is no way Oregon or Oregon State gets left out, but can you make that argument about UH? 

    Oregon will bail with UW in a heartbeat if given the chance.

    Maybe the B1G's in a hurry to get to 20?

  7. 1 minute ago, Laxtonto said:

    So then, once again the B12 either made a mistake by back filling now that other Pac12 schools will be available or the B12 is now screwed because the Texas schools are all about to bail

    Tech, TCU, and BU ain't dumb enough to join a Pac league without USC and UCLA.

    Why?

×
×
  • Create New...