But, if you look historically, abortion was known by the founders, since it had been preformed much earlier than the 1700's yet they felt no need to prohibit it because it was a not- so- common procedure of the time, and it wasn't seen as a living being at the time, since it was not post partum... and yet the knowledge of a repeating rifle should be taken into account with gun control, and all science should be ignored.
But of course, the most basic argument against originalism was that slavery was ratified among the several states..
And yet here we are arriving at the thought that amendments mean something to the constitution, and that substantive due process is of no concern... so, also, see above, but yet here we are, about to ask own slaves again? If so, do we also ignore women's right to vote?
They've tied themselves in to so many knots that they shouldn't be able to functionality write anything, much less an opinion...
Just wait for this newest ruling... that innocence isn't enough to overturn a conviction. . It's amazing