Let's look at this a little bit more objectively...
A group of people used force to climb fences designed to warn them and keep them out of a secured facility.
When this group encountered barricades manned by security personnel, staffed there in order to keep them out of this secured facility, they attacked the barricades and the security staff who were there to enforce the security of the secure building.
The group then bypassed the officials in place to enforce the security of the secured building with violent means, use of brute force, and makeshift weapons.
This group then physically breaks the doors and windows designed to keep uninvited people out, through physical force and use of tools (an enhancement in normal breaking and entering cases, and moreso in home invasion cases, as well as bank jobs and heists...) and gain access to the secured facility.
The group also then act in a physically threatening manner to staff charged with the security, and make vocal threats to the staff inside the secured facility.
The group consists several physical assaults and batteries of said security staff, as well as commit felony murder (a charge that makes everyone involved a murderer)
Some of the group then accesses an area that is secured within the secured facility (enhanced security) and then proceeds to assault that portion of the building, threatening both verbally, and physically the protectees of the secured facility and also assaulting and causing physical harm to the staff of the secured facility, and then FINALLY one of the officers in charge of the security of the facility discharged one round into one of the people that passed all of those warnings, barriers, staff, in multiple layers of concentric security, and kills one of the group that is spearheading the attack on his protectees...
I'm fairly certain you can all see the conclusion coming... but this person spearheading the break into YET ANOTHER layer of security gets shot ans killed, and we are to somehow think that person is a martyr?
And we are to somehow think that this person was not guilty of several incidences of crimes that a reasonable person could, and probably should kill that person, and they're a martyr?
I mean, let's just break this down into the objective facts.
From what I've learned from this board over the decade I've been in it is that any Texan would've killed as many as he could've and rightfully so.
It's not even in the same stratosphere as the BLM protests, riots, break-ins, whatever you want to call those acts of riotous vandalism that they did on empty, vacated, places of business.
Fuck that dumb cunt. They'd have all been subject to death in righteously shot in most states by any home or business owner, and 100% subject to legal shooting in any other armed secured building in any state.
Fucking complete idiotic privilege in full force.
In fact, most of them would be facing life in any other state case in which the state prosecuted this group, and possible capital punishment in a number of states.