Jump to content

SKJ

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    1717
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SKJ

  1. I'll just leave this here. It needs to be reminded
  2. Trump's tweets against Dems have always seemed like one of those faces book things. Like month they were born in, and the last digit of your telephone number. Weak on crime and bad for military!
  3. Brought to you by Wrangler. The original skinny jeans
  4. Triple citizenship
  5. https://twitter.com/drmistercody/status/1057514992831000576?s=20
  6. The only rule to a fight: The winner gets to decide when it's over
  7. Arby done fucked up
  8. Very little chance of that since this fat fuck probably can swallow them whole like a stork
  9. If you would still vote for Trump, then you're nothing but a fucking idiot partisan republicuck trumpfucker.
  10. Just to put this out there... I work with a person that has a fucking CARD for a tribe. His card reads that he is 3/1024 (or something like that) blood native American. He is a member of that tribe.
  11. So, what you're saying is, if she's dressed slutty, she wants it? Should we blame the man if he raped her? The point is, and bear with me, because I know this might seem strange, but the person doing the punching is responsible for his actions. But, you know, she was totally dressed for it.
  12. SKJ

    Kanye

    Dyson by knockout in the first
  13. Well, naturally, he'd be dead...
  14. He always crosses his arms kinda like my 6-year-old daughter, when she knows she's in trouble
  15. See prior comments
  16. I mean, maybe... The big guy really doesn't have any footwork. He crosses his legs badly, and could've been on the receiving end of a knockdown had he been hit when he's overstepping with his right leg while holding his right haymaker cocked with both hands low. They both have atrocious footwork, and that right was so telegraphed it came from last Thursday. It's not like he was switching during that exchange, he was crossing his feet horribly. Balance was shit the whole time. He's just big enough to deflect the horrible shots (and footwork) of the scrawny guy. I would've knocked his ass out when he took that huge step over his lead leg with his right hand cocked and his left hand down.
  17. This guy's a boxer. Beautiful to see.
  18. You know what would be even better? If the republicucks would just by their own values before they try and implement them on everyone else. Their hypocrisy knows no bounds
  19. You're thinking of Chips
  20. I'm guessing he's still trying to salvage a story that he's innocent... If he can shut down the investigation through firing at last ol' Rod, and if he can get cover from the Supremes, then maybe he can shut it all down
  21. This is just not factual
  22. Probably better than continually fucking over Chuck. What fails to remain unsaid is that one party could snap to what's right, correct itself, and win the Chuck's of the world right back. Republicucks could win more by being earnest than by being enemies.
  23. Or, and I'm just spitballin here, they could also be as good as third graders and love up to the standards they learned in kindergarten. Lulz. The very definition of hypocrisy kind of speaks directly to this situation. But who are we kidding, right? Except I'm a man of honor, and politicians are behaving in such a way that even my kids know is wrong. Of course, who needs standards, right? I don't expect republicucks to understand, but I hope you never forget, things go the other way, too.
  24. This is not quite accurate. The "other side" stated that they would not like anyone to be nominated before midterms, an assertion that the republicucks went with regarding Garland. So, in a sense, they just wanted the republicucks to live up to their own bullshit. (Which, of course, was too much to ask...) Once that was settled, by the republicuck's own actions, then became the questions of character of the nominee... (It's truly funny how hypocritical they have shown themselves to be during this whole process, though not surprising at all...) I mean, sure, if you can't separate those issues, one might think they are the same, but let's not be disingenuous about the whole deal. They created the precedent with Garland, so one might be led to believe that they would live up to their own standards, but that would be too much to ask. But to say that they would have "smeared" any nomination because of their own hypocrisy isn't the case, but it makes a good strawman. If the r-cucks cared anything at all about the quality of their nominee, they obviously wouldn't have jammed this guy through, and would have let the libcucjs prove their hypothesis, and withdrawn, and nominated someone without so much bullshit surrounding them, thereby proving their point. But alas, we are not a nation of honor after all.
  25. As I'm sure everyone knows. I don't even watch sports. I just love this place. That being said, I'm a fan of Sam (don't know how to spell his last name). That's some badass shit.
×
×
  • Create New...