Chrispy

If he’s asked, sure, I agree with you. Anyway, truce. The meatballs bit is funny.

Exactly, simply use the correct pronoun under compulsion and this all goes away. Thank you sir, ugh, I mean they.

Kyrie is right, I got sucked in again. No amount of evidence will be enough, so with that, I’ll meet you in another thread BT, as well as your ever present side kick I’m sure.

BT, the brain truly sees what it wants to see and I believe you are exhibiting this rather pathetic human characteristic in an exemplary fashion. The university’s lawyers were concerned of legal implications, which only proves the merit of Peterson’s case. They urged him to stop and his job was hanging in the balance, until his support grew to such an extent that the university was painted into a corner. The OHRC does not have the power to fire Peterson. He had a conversation, if you want to call it that, with Brenda Cossman, not some random lawyer. She used to author reports for the Law Commission of Canada, which counseled the Canadian government on matters of law. So, she knows full well what the OHRC is capable of and, of course, has supported the commission in many public debates. I’m sorry, but if a staunch adversary of mine mentions financial ruin at the hands of the Human Rights Tribunal, which is not an uncommon practice, I’m considering that a very serious threat indeed. The OHRC commissioner, Renu Mandhane, admitted that the incorrect use of pronouns is discrimination and could get you fined, so Peterson’s assertion of fines is correct. Whether she called him personally or not, the explicit threat was made. https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/yes-xer-acts-of-misgendering-considered-discrimination-in-ontario

Ok David.

What does “financial ruin” mean to you?

What you think of him is irrelevant. BT’s imp wanted a link to support the notion that Peterson was absolutely subject to financial implications.

Around the 10:00 minute mark he starts to mention the financial implications regarding the OHRC. I think the term used was “financially ruined”, so it was actually worse than my original assertions of mere fines. Please send your daddy BT my regards.

EJ just flipped his NaNa CB to Notre Dame. Guess it’s time for a Gile’s special.

Fair enough, I’ve beaten this dead horse enough and it’s an exercise in futility. Thanks for helping me come to my senses.

Receiving cease and desist letters from the university for violating provisions of the OHRC, which of course, is fines. But it’s just another day at the office, I’m sure. You are a fascinating creature.

Lulz, of course not BT. Of course not.

Trisomy 13, 18, 21? You need to be more specific if you want the joke to land.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/canadian-bill-opposing-transgenderism-will-put-you-in-jail

https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2017/11/22/university-faces-uproar-over-recording-showing-how-teaching-assistant-was-questioned This poor woman was reprimanded for showing a debate involving Jordan Peterson on gender pronouns and was told it was akin to defending Hitler. Nope, they’re not forcing any speech down anyone’s throats.

I don’t believe so, I’ll call them what they wish. As long as they ask, of course. But at the end of the day, chromosomes are chromosomes and they dictate gender.

That’s Klinefelter syndrome and is extremely rare, but they’re males. People who have both what? Genitalia? They’re hermaphrodites. These are both medical conditions. Yes, U of T urged Jordan Peterson to comply with the new law and use the correct pronouns for fear of criminal prosecution. He was also physically threatened and his office vandalized. Thankfully he has not budged, and his support continues to grow, as it should. As far as I can tell that guy follows you around and has very little to add to the conversation, but we all have our roles I suppose.

Who are you?

Again, that was yesterday. Bless your heart.

Sure, I believe one’s chromosomes dictates whether they are male or female in the womb and that it can’t be reversed. However, I have no ill will towards the LGBT community at all, I say live and let live. If a biological male wants me to call him a female, I’ll indulge her and not think twice about it. No, this is about speech for me. Once it goes beyond asking and into the realm compulsion, that I simply will not put up with. Also, the 1950’s seemed like they sucked, so no thanks.

Enlighten me.

Oh come on, you can do better than that. Really try to hurt me this time.

Ok, that’s what I figured. Thanks.

How insightful.

But physically, they are one or the other correct?