Jump to content

Voluminous Banality

Full Members
  • Posts

    365
  • Joined

Everything posted by Voluminous Banality

  1. Weigman somehow managed to fire off more clichés in this short clip than he had incomplete passes against Domer. Point blank period I count 21 in 42 seconds.
  2. Sitting. National championship winner.
  3. The predictable narrative synergy coming out of this game for aggy is delicious. Weigman had an all-time horrific performance because he didn't realize how great the offensive line was playing, but that's not on him. And the O-line will likely be even better going forward, if that's possible, after their starting center went down to injury.
  4. This will be delivered to Elko's office this week:
  5. The Elk's defense doesn't play for sacks. It stays disciplined to contain long runs.
  6. You're doing this wrong. Georgia, Texas, Alabama, Ole Miss, Tennessee, and Texas A&M outscored their opponents 307-32.
  7. "We don't win when we are in Texas' shadow. We've tried that for a hundred years."
  8. Maybe they can coax Haynes King into the portal.
  9. Highlights for aggy: Notre Dame is really, really good. Aggy defense was tremendous. Offense averaged nearly 4 yards per play. 100% efficiency in the red zone (2-for-2 with 2 FGs).
  10. He looks more comfortable in his skin than he did at aggy.
  11. Only 3 things can happen when DJ Uiageileoeolaiai holds the ball...
  12. Surly before the game: The line is way too high. Taking GT and the points all the way. After one FSU drive: This game is over. Tech fans, hide your women and children. After one Georgia Tech drive: I fucking told you!!!
  13. Does Velton Gardner play with a chip on his shoulder? Does he get the defense riled up during practice? Can we pencil him in as our short yardage and goal line back, having scored a grand total of one touchdown in his career? Is he the vibe? Until we can answer all of these in the affirmative AND he becomes a burgeoning fat ass with anger issues, let's hold off on anointing him as the next Savion Red. Make the man earn his stripes.
  14. This isn't that hard to figure out. Is it dumb? Yes, it's dumb. It was probably easier to ask parents to approve all subject material rather than wrangle in the legislature over what specific subjects need parental approval. Or possibly this is some asshole administrator's clever way of protesting or of screwing with everyone with the implementation, in which case, props to that guy.
  15. Mea culpa. I was going for brevity, but that was definitely an inexcusable omission. You'll also be interested to know that 'troglodyte' has blown up in the last 25 years. Coincidence? I think not.
  16. I love how sports message boards are bringing back classic words lost to the literarily unversed modern reader. CTJ pulling weight here.
  17. A couple of weeks ago, before Machinator's return, you might have been first with this.
  18. Savion Red is quite possibly the most overhyped, barely three-star, consensus #1414-rated recruit of all time. In a heated recruiting battle, Texas beat out Kansas, SMU, and Mississippi Valley State for his services. In two years with the Longhorns, Red totaled 131 rushing yards, more than half of which came against Texas Tech in the late 3rd and 4th quarters of a 57-7 blowout. After two seasons of ascent, Red managed to climb to 5th or 6th on the depth chart before transferring to Alabama Nevada where, reportedly, Red has been equally impressive and has been praised for his “moxie” and for “getting the defense riled up” during practice. This underwhelming list of achievements hasn’t kept half of Surly from ruing Red’s unfulfilled potential and devastating departure from the program. Even before the injuries to Baxter and Clark, these talent-evaluating cognoscenti would have gladly shipped off Jake Majors and Michael Taaffe to secure Red’s return. Taking injuries into account, they wouldn’t hesitate to throw in Hayden Conner.
  19. Many posters here have a hard time separating their strong political leanings from objective analysis. It wasn't my intention to set forth a premise on the attribution of credit for gains in net US export of petroleum across some decades. I was responding to a tweet which misrepresented data from 2017-2023 and that was the extent of my response. Reading comprehension is key and my limited analysis was entirely correct. The original tweet by Rattner was misleading and the data was badly presented. It's possible to recognize this and still give Obama credit for the recovery in US oil net exports if that's how you wish to interpret the data. Understanding the data first is a good starting point whomever you support.
  20. Correct. The dude has now shifted to, "Well, Trump doesn't get credit for the increase in net exports during his term because he did fuck all." 🤦‍♂️ The original tweet was stupid and misleading, period. That's all I'm responding to, since someone asked.
×
×
  • Create New...