Lol, that’s not how it works. You can’t just shout something and claim it to be true.
The burden of proof lies with you as you insisted that it doesn’t make sense. Prove it to me. Give me the numbers. Bonus points if you can give me the cost of a desalination plant.
There’s solutions for problems everywhere. It doesn’t mean people immediately adopt them. I firmly believe it just proof of concept on a larger scale.
The point is it’s a lower cost compared to the desalination plant. Your infrastructure cost is much higher for a desalination plant. The atmospheric water generation uses gravity which only results in way less pumps than something that is installed at sea level.
I agree carbon credits have been around for awhile but you don’t see people pairing them with other water production solutions to my knowledge. You also have a tremendous amount of focus on climate change. Now more than ever. This is most interesting to me because for decades we used water to produce electricity and now we may be using electricity to produce water.
People will use atmospheric water generation at local levels on a much larger scale than desalination plants. No one will build one and pump water to Denver or Austin for example. Why? Because it costs way too much.
I could sit here and waste my time and start quoting my kWh, fuel costs, daily/hourly gallon production to you but I unfortunately don’t share the same passion for message boards as you do.