Jump to content

BurntOrange&White

New Members
  • Posts

    35441
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    20

Posts posted by BurntOrange&White

  1. Just now, NotActuallyALonghorn said:

     

    Why do you think I'm arguing against it? I've said repeatedly said I am for them as long as they aren't written poorly. Go back to posts 921 and 922. I laid out a pretty comprehensive proposal that would likely get enough support from gun rights advocates to pass. Red flag laws were a part of that.

    I’m for them as long as they do what I want!

  2. 27 minutes ago, CooterBrown said:


    I have a similar LG with that same ice maker. If you need to fill more than 6-8 glasses of ice, you’ll run out. Keep space in the freezer for a bag of ice on hand.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    The initial one we looked at only had door ice maker so we returned to get this one which happened to only be $100 more than other cause the sale was worse. This has dual ice maker…

     

    90B5C282-9F3C-4428-8A1F-E3B08890D2B2.jpeg

  3. 5 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

    I've already made it clear that I think it's ridiculous to believe she secretly plotted it all out over years to ruin his career. A lot of posters seem to agree with me about that.  You obviously don't and are throwing one hell of a temper tantrum over that disagreement. That's fine, I guess. Knock yourself out.

    Simp GIF by nervous.exe

    • Hook 'Em 1
    • Haha 7
  4. 8 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

    I'd be curious to see a transcript of the part of the trial you're describing. Because the ACLU has also admitted to writing the article. My guess is they ghostwrote it with input from her and I know their general counsel also had input. I suspect you're misstating what was actually said at trial, much as she probably didn't do a great job describing how the article was written. People actually rarely say what is 100% literally true all the time, that's just not really how human communication works. It seems like she's not generally a trustworthy person, but I've read enough to know that a lot of what people are saying are "proven lies" from the trial are pretty far from that (like the whole "SHE LIED ABOUT DONATING HER DIVORCE SETTLEMENT" nonsense).  

    Some of you guys need to work on just having the same standards for Depp that you do for her. 

    https://youtu.be/mmspY9YZjgc

  5. 3 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

    This is not a random sample or anything, but I just searched for "Amber Heard" on Surly and there were literally zero posts about her op-ed or anything related to it until this trial began. Someone upthread said they didn't even remember her accusing him of abuse and that's why. Nobody read it at the time. It didn't blow up like Cosby or Weinstein. Depp's career was already dying because he'd been in a bunch of flops and people hated working with him. The studio didn't even know about her op ed when they decided not to offer him a role for the sixth Pirates of the Caribbean.  

    I'd agree with your position a lot more if she'd specifically named him. Then it probably would've been a bigger story at the time. But she didn't and it wasn't. Depp made this a world-wide front page story, not her.

    When it came out it made the news all over the world. Just because surly didn't talk about it doesn't mean it's not a big deal. She initially denied that she wrote the damn hit article then that was proven to be a false when the cross got her to admit to writing it.

     

    Like did you watch or read anything on this case until after it was over?

    • Hook 'Em 1
  6. 1 minute ago, Cheeseweasel said:

    No, I recognized that they were both toxic. Me and my wife yelling about which way the the toilet paper goes on the roll does not make either of us "abusers".

    She's a fraud and tried to hijack the spotlight from ACTUAL abuse victims.

    She's such a lying bitch she even lied about donating money to charity.

    • Hook 'Em 2
  7. Just now, 'stache said:

    I honestly don't give a shit. I think she was both an abused and an abuser. I would have told them to both get the fuck out of my courtroom with your little spat.

    She literally ruined his career at the time.....she staged photos, videos, and etc of him to try and manipulate the public interest, she altered photos of herself to say he abused her. Fuck her and I'm glad this bitch is going to be bankrupt.

    • Hook 'Em 2
    • Like 1
  8. 1 minute ago, dcbc said:

    Wasn't the jury charged with her statement relating to "sexual violence"?  I know she testified to two incidents which would qualify, but I don't recall there being any physical evidence to corroborate her testimony as to those two alleged incidents.  And while her testimony would be sufficient to support her alleged defamatory statement, if the jurors found her to be generally untruthful, it is understandable that they would discount or disbelieve her testimony on the subject of occurrences of "sexual violence."

    One was a bottle that broke off in her but no medical records of the incident. I’m not expert but I’m sure it glass breaks in you there needs to be medical care. 

    • Hook 'Em 3
×
×
  • Create New...