Jump to content

Hookah Horns

Full Members
  • Posts

    2786
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Hookah Horns

  1. Pretty sure it's the biggest of the $9.95 sites and has been since they began. IT is a far superior product though.
  2. It's my dad's sub that I use from time to time because it's a good community despite having a lot of dumbasses. Def not there because of jabba the ketch or the product.
  3. Ah this explains why some jackass on Orangebloods was ranting about the libs killing hundreds of thousands by "banning and suppressing" HCQ. Apparently some observational study (which are always dubious) came out which concluded early administration of HCQ/zithro reduced hospitalizations by 84%. This clown was going on and on about how 84% of the 600k dead could have been saved but for the banning of HCQ. I tried setting him straight and I'm sure y'all know how that went.
  4. Yep, I've recommended that book a lot, including in this thread. Everyone needs to see how evil this company is and how it operates.
  5. I can't wrap my head around how retarded this is. $98k per room (probably per homeless person - I can't find any info on if these rooms are to be single occupancy, but I'm guessing so).
  6. I like the sense of urgency from Adler and his minions to earmark this money for homeless when they don't even have the slightest clue of how to put it to good use.
  7. Thinking about just how fucking dumb, regretful, and ashamed he must have felt at the end warms all my cockles.
  8. Pathetic. I actually hope this is bullshit revisionism, as opposed to the FBI/DHS being full of people this fucking dumb.
  9. I guess those R voters haven't been informed that their team is supposed to be against it yet.
  10. Well, an ambassador got killed, which is kind of a biggie. The Hillary witch trials got to be pretty damn stupid though.
  11. I don't agree that "failed" implies former success.
  12. 91 politicians since September? Got damn. Anyone still running for local office in hot spots has got brass balls.
  13. The root cause of this is people basing their entire identity on their thoughts and beliefs. Meditation helps with this.
  14. I'm sorry if I was rude. Definitely wasn't my intent. I appreciated that was what you were doing. I thought I was being polite, so maybe I'm just an asshole.
  15. I'll rep them pro bono. I'm not a criminal defense attorney, but I'm confident a defense consisting of hours of Tucker tape will result in an acquittal, so long as I don't get an entire jury of trumptards.
  16. Truly great post @Brisketexan
  17. I'm open to more discussion. I'm just saying I haven't found your arguments about the chart to be persuasive, and that my opinion that their claims are ludicrous and offensive is unlikely to be changed. Kind of similar to how nobody is going to persuade me, e.g., that it isn't ludicrous and offensive to call an elementary school a superior academic institution to UT. At some point in any discourse you have sufficient information and arguments and have a different opinion. It doesn't mean I'm closed minded or on some kind of quest. No need for a facetious apology.
  18. We were. I'm not sure how saying we'll have to agree to disagree means it wasn't. What do you perceive to be my "quest"?
  19. I didn't say that. I guess you're referring to my omission of linearity from the post you quoted, which wasn't intentional. But yeah, it seems like they'd have just said "emphasis on linear thinking" if that's the distinction they wanted to make. Anyway, I think it's a ludicrous and offensive view and probably won't be changing my mind about that, so we can agree to disagree.
  20. I'd agree that those were fraudulent uses of the scientific method. But the emphasis didn't produce those things.
  21. I wouldn't say either of those things are the product of an emphasis on the scientific method. And again I think it's pretty insane to say an emphasis on the scientific method, objective/rational thinking, and cause/effect analysis have been foisted on the world by the white folks. That'd piss me off if I wasn't white. Hell, it pisses me off even though I am.
  22. Yeah I know it's a polemic, but it has citations so I gave it a little more cred than I would've otherwise. I've also read similar things elsewhere.
  23. Not a CRT source per se, but here's a graphic where the African American History Museum says the emphasis on the scientific method, quant reasoning, objective and rational linear thinking, and cause/effect relationships are white people stuff. Saw this recently and its absurdity has stuck with me. At the very least it jibes with the criticism of CRT you reject with "no."
  24. Here and some other places. The law review article washpark posted is the only other source I have handy, and here's how it puts it: "First, the storytellers view narratives as central to scholarship, while de-emphasizing conventional analytic methods."
×
×
  • Create New...