OU Sucks

I didn't do any of that, but I happen to live next to an airport and posted a night video of a small business jet on short approach to the runway. It was blatantly obvious it was a plane, and my caption sarcastically said how it looked resembled that plane model, and so on....it was the most obvious joke in the world. The video blew up at got 1M views in 5 days, with comments ranging from a bunch of "it's a plain [sic] you idiot" to bizarro conspiracy theory/shady government stuff. We already knew this, but this country is fucked.

This guy doesn't seem as unhinged as DFig... Oh wait.

Graham is my favorite fiction author ever. https://gigemgazette.com/way-too-early-sec-2025-record-predictions-texas-a-m-football-takes-step-next-season Strange he only mentioned one of their three cupcakes again...

Graham ranks how difficult each SEC team's schedule is for 2025, predictably ranks Texas as one of the easiest: https://gigemgazette.com/where-does-texas-a-m-football-fit-in-the-most-difficult-2025-sec-schedules Ah yes, stupid sips and their cupcake OOC schedule* (*besides that Horseshoe team that's consistently in the top 10)! Meanwhile, let's not mention aggy playing UTSA, Utah State and Samford, or dodging both Bama and Georgia again.

I already lost by spending about 5 hours debunking "drone" sightings over the past few days. All over something no one will care about in 2 weeks. But I'm happy all the submersible experts got to add a drone degree to their resume, though.

No no no, I picked and completed my investigation...someone else gets stuck with JFK.

If only we could figure out what is happening 20 miles west of Newark. Oh right, that's the downwind leg for Newark Airport 🤣 Not to mention all the other traffic crossing through to get to Teterboro and 7 billion other airports. Loved the interview I saw where an old guy was describing a long line of never-ending "drones" going over. Yeah dude, that's how airplanes go into airports.

Those aren't triangular blue lights. That's a horrid quality camera showing 3 white lights and two lights on the left and right ends, which just so happen to match up with the red and green navigation lights on airplanes. Green on the right wingtip, red on the left: He said that was taken at 5:45pm on December 1st. Let's take a look at what was over his area at that exact time: A Cessna 172. Right through Mendham: Why's there a bright white light at the back of the plane? Because that's what Cessna 172s have: Every. Fucking. Video. Has. Been. Of. A. Normal. Plane. Or. Helicopter.

The news media, because they don't know the difference between an Airbus A380 and a beluga whale (and not to be confused with the Airbus Beluga) keeps playing clips of commercial and GA planes and calling them drones. See the below clip for reference. All. Fucking. Normal. Planes. And dumb people, who started looking up at the night sky for the first time, are recording video of United 737s and calling them drones, because obviously drones have navigation lights, landing lights and a United tail logo. Today, I saw a lady post on X that her area never used to get any air traffic and now she's seeing a bunch of drones go over. I did some light stalking and found out she lives on the fucking. base. leg. of. the. approach. to. Newark. Airport. There's no mass drone invasion going on. I have yet to see a single video of an actual drone during this whole thing in NJ.

This has been a story for a few weeks here in NJ and I guess it's finally started to pick up traction nationally. Basically, the maroons [sic] here think lights in the night sky are mysterious drones and have been posting pictures and videos of commercial airliners, bizjets, general aviation planes and helicopters, and identifying them as drones. I thought "surely the government/FBI would step in and mention that most or all of these sightings were normal planes", but instead they've been feeding into it. Not shockingly, most of the sightings are in Northern NJ, which is the busiest airspace in the country. https://6abc.com/post/large-drones-spotted-philadelphia-area-fbi-investigates-mysterious-drone-sightings-new-jersey/15630194/ https://www.app.com/picture-gallery/news/2024/12/10/drones-in-the-sky-over-toms-river/76891229007 I've been able to determine the pictures in the second article include a Guimbal Cabri G2 helicopter (registration N814U), a United Airlines 737 MAX 9 (N27511), and some American Airlines planes. You can literally see their logos on the tail:

There's gotta be some 0.9x multiplier or other deduction factored in since Quinn was begging for booty pics. I mean, even Case was out there filming booty*. *Possibly under murky circumstances we probably shouldn't discuss

It was probably this photo: And again, the crazy brows probably did him in. Good thing he didn't go to Texas, where he could've hidden among the 50% of people with huge fucking eyebrows, I've been told.

So his family's company also treats patients like crap...

That, plus his huge fucking eyebrows.

Maybe he wanted a Happy Meal and they required him to be under a certain age? Or, more likely, NY Post completely made that up, like they tend to do.

The people pinning this on Auburn are just looking at the tied score and figuring we just needed one of the missed FGs to go our way to win. But 1) not giving him credit for scoring 13 of our 19 points, and 2) not giving equal weight to the fact that Quinn and the offense had the opportunity to score 49 points when they got within the UGA 30, and had to kick the field goal or turned the ball over all of those times. We didn't even sniff the end zone. So if Auburn went 4 for 6 (really 5 for 6 since one make was wiped away by a dumb penalty), then Quinn and company were 0 for 7 on TDs within the UGA 30. So it was everybody's fault, not just Auburn's for missing 2 of 6 FGs. At some point, some blame has to fall on the guy who touches the football every snap and makes the decisions on where and when to distribute it. We get a TD just one of those times instead of settling for a field goal and the conversation is completely different. We're going to have to figure out our red zone woes against decent defenses before the CFP because it seems like the only way we can score a TD is if it's a run after catch over 30 yards or we are able to run the ball.

It's nice seeing a QB who doesn't get spooked by pressure, stands in and throws an accurate ball knowing he's about to get drilled. Also saw a few times where he eluded heavy pressure but kept scanning for receivers while doing so, which is pretty rare for a QB in his first year of meaningful snaps. No need to throw the offensive line under the bus or one of 80 other excuses...he just makes shit happen.

And 3 total points in our last four 3rd quarters. Is there a way to bet on how many points we'll score in the third quarter against Clemson? If so, is it an over/under of 1?

I too, delivered "balls into tight windows" back in my day.

.

Would have been an even cooler story if we could just punch it into the end zone once in 6 attempts near the red zone, like any other offense with a ton of weapons should be able to do. If we did that, this wouldn't even be a discussion. And the 42-yarder was near the right hash, right after (again), he had to re-kick. That's not a gimme in college, even in a domed stadium. How do you expect to get through the CFP if you can't score one fucking TD in six attempts within the 27 yard line (seven attempts if you count OT)?

He hit the first one, which he then had to redo because our dumb guys jumped. That's going to get into the head of most kickers, especially after he barely kept it in and had to go back another 5 yards. Also, he constantly had to kick it from the right or left hash, instead of being lined up right in the center. Cool story, but Auburn hit 4 FGs. He missed his second FG when it was 10-6. He hit the FG to tie it, and he hit his attempt in OT. You can scapegoat Auburn all you want, but if the offense did a single thing to help, Auburn's tying FG could've been the game winner or insurance points. In fact, if the offense just didn't hurt his chances by taking a 5 yard penalty or 6 yard sack right before his misses, he probably hits at least one of them. In fact, he did hit one of them, only for us to wipe it off with the penalty.

The problem there is that Sark really didn't have any good options other than to kick the FG because penalties or sacks put us way behind the chains. The yards to go on 4th down were: 12, 9, 10, 16, 15, 11. It would be a dumb decision to go for it on any of those.

That kicker also missed a 44 yarder and went 2 for 3, which was the same exact percentage as the guy who everyone is bitching about. Yeah, the two misses suck, but what sucks more is we made it to Georgia's 23, 22, 19, 27, 14 and 14 yard line, and we had to attempt the field goal every time, due to taking sacks, getting penalties or missing passes. Get a TD any of those six times and we win the game. Pressuring your kicker to hit 6 FGs, 4 of which were over 40 yards, because you can't accomplish jack shit in the red zone is the main issue.

Literally, with the turnover sword.