I was okay with Quinn over Arch because Arch would theoretically be more prone to costly turnovers and taking big sacks (pun kind of intended). The strength of Quinn's game was he protected the football, almost to the point where he was too careful at times. That was all good, but the past two weeks, he's turned it over 4 times and taken a bunch of sacks, making it tough to convert first downs and making for longer field goal attempts. You can try blaming away the turnovers on everyone besides Quinn, but turnovers are turnovers and you could argue it could've been worse. I'm pretty sure Arch could've matched or exceeded Quinn's stat line, with the added dimension of the defense having to account for a running QB. And I'm absolutely sure Arch could have hit the 5 yard pass that Moore turned into 41 yards, and our only TD the entire game.