Jump to content

Katfid54

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    5565
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    37

Katfid54 last won the day on September 11 2023

Katfid54 had the most liked content!

Reputation

8594 Surly 1%

1 Follower

About Katfid54

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. You think Cam Rising and Diego Pavia are killing CFB??? Get a grip, dude.
  2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statute_of_limitations
  3. I am a lawyer. But I was talking about attempts to use the bag game to still get recruits to sign; that's obviously still an illegal contract that has no force or effect. So if the speculation that Sims decided to take a bag and sign, instead of considering future NIL $$$, I struggle to see how the bag game keeps anyone at a school given current free agency around the CFB landscape. Re: draconian NIL provisions--are y'all putting arbitration provisions in the NIL contracts? That's almost certainly enforceable and not, generally, draconian. But I'd think that would help keep a lid on public issues to a certain extent.
  4. The issue is what happens after year 1. (Or, hell, the end of the spring window.) We've already seen the exodus from College Station for their bag game recruits. Why would any recruit stay? Take the bag. Sign. Then transfer to somewhere that actually has NIL.
  5. Jim Breuer is just cross-eyed Will Forte
  6. I guess that's the point, though. Bush may have some NIL claims from 2016-present, as USC/NCAA/etc. have continued to use his likeness. And maybe those claims are not time-barred because of statute of limitations was tolled pursuant to American Pipe. But how would any of Bush's pre-2016 claims not be time-barred?
  7. I imagine that the argument is NIL was always "legal" and the NCAA/Pac12/USC improperly conspired to prevent Bush (and other collegiate athletes) from profiting on their names, images, and likenesses. Now, how Bush's suit against the NCAA isn't covered by House, I'm not sure. Maybe he was able to opt out of the pending settlement? Or maybe he's suing individually before the settlement is finalized, and his statute of limitations has somehow been tolled all this time under the American Pipe doctrine? Edited to add: Also possible that Bush's suit will be consolidated into House.
  8. Agree. For Futureman, "ignore him" seems too light of a punishment. I recommend:
×
×
  • Create New...