Football ...
Basketball ...
Baseball ...
Other Sports ...
Futbol ...
🤫995🤫 ...
Gambling ...
Movies & TV ...
Music ...
Hobbies ...
Lulz ...
Food & Travel
...
Daily Texan ...
Business & Markets ...
Cloak Room ...
Help ...
For Sale ...
Board Discussion ...
Advertise...
Tailgate Donations
-
Posts
5629 -
Joined
-
Days Won
37
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Recruiting - 2020
2019-2020 Football Season
Football
Entertainment
Sports
News and Business
Cloak Room
Transfer Portal
Recruiting
Events
Everything posted by Katfid54
-
Baize, if you jinx this shit, I swear to gawd...
-
Your mother and I are getting a divorce.
-
Meh. It's not a great play, but Ferguson pretty clearly has the RT beat, and Burrow can't cleanly step up in the pocket with 95 pushing the LT back, too. Plus, it's possible (although probably unlikely) that he sees Jackson (10) coming in on a delayed inside blitz and knows he needs to escape away from it.
-
If Bimage has C gap there, when he rips outside the tackle, he has to make a pile, instead of overrunning the line and turning into the backfield. He has to make a pile and, if not make a pile, at least move laterally back down the LOS.
-
Don't forget how much Jameis developed between his freshman and sophomore years!
-
Could be. That also makes it way easier to block their bubble and tunnel screens. I'm not opposed to manning up Jalen Green on Hardy all night. Hardy is very good and is Smith's safety blanket. If he's smothered, Smith will look elsewhere with the ball and will likely make some bad decisions with it.
-
He was very good at their timing routes. Hit almost all of them with good accuracy, even the more difficult throws like the deep out I GIFed above. His receivers struggled catching his throws on the slants, from what I watched. When he wasn't throwing a pre-determined route, though, he was extremely inconsistent and oftentimes hesitant. This will be his third year as a starter, so maybe those tougher reads start to click, but when he was working through a progression in 2018, he was ineffective. And, again, he was really bad if he was under any sort of pressure. If his feet were moving when he threw the ball, there was a very low chance it was going to be anywhere near his targets.
-
This. Compare Texas vs. oSu 2017 with Texas vs. oSu 2018. The ability to stop OZ in 2017 was basically the ENTIRE difference between those two games.
-
I’ve read a lot of people providing high-level thoughts that La Tech is “worse than Maryland” and that the game should be an easy one. But I haven’t seen any actual write-up analysis of the game. So I bit the bullet last night and watched La Tech/LSU from last season. Below are my thoughts, with GIFs of some representative plays from that game. Note: to the extent occurrences in the La Tech/LSU game were outliers, it is the only game of La Tech’s that I watched from last year. So I am wholly basing my opinions on that totally inadequate sample size. With that said, let’s get to it. What to expect from La Tech’s offense? Offensive Coordinator and Scheme: La Tech’s OC is Todd Fitch. Fitch has been with Skip Holtz since 2007 at ECU almost continually, although he had a three-year stopover in Boston College from 2012-2015 before reuniting with Holtz at La Tech in 2016. Fitch was passing game coordinator at Iowa State in 2004 under Dan McCarney, where he coached true freshman Bret Meyer to 7 wins, including a victory over Nebraska. Prior to that, he was an assistant under OC Skip Holtz at South Carolina when Lou Holtz was head coach. Offensively, Orlando’s dime will get a LOT of run this game. La Tech runs 4 wide almost every play. They sometimes bring in an insert-back, but almost never have a true TE in on a play. They’d prefer to motion a big WR into the box to help block than to substitute in a TE. La Tech runs no huddle, but their tempo is not anywhere near what most of the teams in the Big XII run. They are not an air raid team. They are more of a traditional spread team. They will attack with bubble screens, WR screens, RB screens, inside zone and traditional spread passing concepts. This will be a good tune up for what we’re going to see out of Neal Brown’s West Virginia on October 5. Offensive Position Players: The first thing that jumps off the page when looking at La Tech is their experience. Across the offense, every single one of their starters is in their third, fourth, or fifth years. Their QB is a RS Sr., and their line goes RS Sr., RS Sr., RS Jr., RS Sr., RS Sr. Texas will not be able to count on La Tech to “lose” the game. La Tech does not blow assignments or commit dumb penalties. They are assignment sound—they just aren’t extremely talented. Quarterback: La Tech returns its starter, J’mar Smith (8), from last year. He is very good at throwing La Tech’s timing routes, and they throw a LOT of them. Like the original spread offenses of the late 90s/early 2000s, La Tech relies on its timing route passing game to generate yards. It does not, generally, try for chunk yardage. La Tech is content to bite off bite-sized yardage through inside zone and screens to work its way down the field. Smith is also decent at throwing intermediate routes to the middle of the field He will buy time with his feet, but he is not a scrambler and generally does not even look to run. Smith struggles pushing the ball downfield with any accuracy. Here's an example: And another example: Smith struggles even more when he has to throw while on the run. Running Backs: La Tech has two main backs—Dancy (23) and Tucker (22)—who are virtually identical. They are shortish scat backs like we see a lot of in the Big XII. Both are good at running inside zone. Here's an example: Here's another example: Both are also used a lot in the passing game and are effective there. Wide Receivers: La Tech’s wide receivers are a mixed bag. There are times where they make fantastic plays, and there are times where they cannot even catch the ball. Their best WR last year was Hardy (who wore 6 last year but apparently is wearing 89 this year?). He is very good and will be a good test for Jalen Green. Notice here that they use WR bubble motion to bring the safety up while their X and Z run right past their defenders. Their only other returning receiver is Alfred (4), who shows up on tape as doing a good job of getting open, although he struggles with catching the ball in traffic. Defensive outlook against La Tech’s Offense: Don’t expect Texas’ defense to have a field day on Saturday. In fact, don’t count on them to be able to reliably pressure the QB at all. Almost everything La Tech does is predicated on timing routes and WR screens. The key is to focus on fundamental football and limit those plays to minimal yardage. La Tech will bail you out by having a WR drop the ball, and they’ll punt and get off the field. If Orlando gets frustrated and starts bringing the house, it could open up big plays for La Tech. Aranda got very aggressive at times against La Tech and pinned his D’s ears back. But La Tech did a nice job of always responding with a timely RB screen for chunk yardage. With that said, La Tech WILL turn the ball over—especially after completing a short pass play when their WRs try to do too much. Orlando’s unit has to be ready to capitalize on those opportunities. What to expect from La Tech’s defense? Defensive Coordinator and Scheme This is a harder breakdown, because La Tech swapped DCs last year. Their new DC is Bob Diaco, who you’ll last remember as a defensive analyst for OU last year when we played them in the cotton bowl and OU’s LB coach when we played them in the Big XII Championship (Diaco was promoted after Stoops was fired). Diaco was fired from OU at the end of the season. Most importantly, you’ll remember Diaco as the coach who invented the fake rivalry between UConn and UCF called the “Civil Conflict,” which UCF refused to recognize (including leaving the “rivalry trophy” on the field after winning the game. Historically, Diaco runs an odd front defense. Ideally, his nose guard will line up in a zero technique and two gap the center, and his ends will two gap the tackles. We’ll see if Diaco has the personnel to do that against Texas. However, La Tech’s current online roster presents as if Diaco will be running a 4-2-5 nickel defense (listing two DEs, two DTs, and two LBs). Defensive Position Players: La Tech’s defense will be experienced. Like their offense, the defense will feature starters who are all in or past their third year. Defensive Line: La Tech’s defensive line last year was boom or bust. But when they boomed, they were very booming. That line loses its two players (45—Ferguson and 99—Garner). Ferguson was a second day pick at the NFL draft. Both were replaced by upperclassmen. It’s tough to figure out what they’ll be this year against the run, given those two losses and the possibility of moving to an odd front. But last year, La Tech’s DL held up well even against a big OL in LSU. LSU was intent to run on La Tech, but La Tech held their own against LSU’s rushing attack. When they faced obvious passing situations last year, the DL’s pass rush was good. Linebackers: Again, assuming last year is an indication, expect this year’s LBs to be good in run fits. This is especially true when La Tech’s safeties assist with run responsibilities. Their strong safety, Jackson (10), jumps out on film. He plays the run like Brandon Jones. Defensive Backs: Their run defense is solid. But the DBs last year did a poor job of holding up in coverage for any length of time. The DBs often lost receivers in space. In fact, La Tech was way better at covering grass than it was at covering wide receviers. DBs lose receivers in space. Way better at covering grass than covering people. Here's an example: Here's another example: Conclusion: This is a great tune up game against a team that will have inferior talent but will not simply give the game away. Texas will have to come prepared, because La Tech is too experience to just roll over and give up. La Tech played LSU close last year in Baton Rouge (La Tech was within three points in the fourth quarter, battling back from being down 14 early in the game). If Texas plays sound assignment football, they should be able to handle La Tech. The -20.5 point spread seems pretty generous to me, but I’d obviously be thrilled for Texas to cover that, because it would really bode well for the team this year. But if Texas isn’t focused on the game and is looking ahead to LSU, this could be an uncomfortable night reminiscent of some squeakers from last season. And if Texas’ defense is too focused on making a splash play, La Tech’s sound fundamentals could lead to some frustrating extended drives.
-
I’ve read a lot of people providing high-level thoughts that La Tech is “worse than Maryland” and that the game should be an easy one. But I haven’t seen any actual write-up analysis of the game. So I bit the bullet last night and watched La Tech/LSU from last season. Below are my thoughts, with GIFs of some representative plays from that game. Note: to the extent occurrences in the La Tech/LSU game were outliers, it is the only game of La Tech’s that I watched from last year. So I am wholly basing my opinions on that totally inadequate sample size. With that said, let’s get to it. What to expect from La Tech’s offense? Offensive Coordinator and Scheme: La Tech’s OC is Todd Fitch. Fitch has been with Skip Holtz since 2007 at ECU almost continually, although he had a three-year stopover in Boston College from 2012-2015 before reuniting with Holtz at La Tech in 2016. Fitch was passing game coordinator at Iowa State in 2004 under Dan McCarney, where he coached true freshman Bret Meyer to 7 wins, including a victory over Nebraska. Prior to that, he was an assistant under OC Skip Holtz at South Carolina when Lou Holtz was head coach. Offensively, Orlando’s dime will get a LOT of run this game. La Tech runs 4 wide almost every play. They sometimes bring in an insert-back, but almost never have a true TE in on a play. They’d prefer to motion a big WR into the box to help block than to substitute in a TE. La Tech runs no huddle, but their tempo is not anywhere near what most of the teams in the Big XII run. They are not an air raid team. They are more of a traditional spread team. They will attack with bubble screens, WR screens, RB screens, inside zone and traditional spread passing concepts. This will be a good tune up for what we’re going to see out of Neal Brown’s West Virginia on October 5. Offensive Position Players: The first thing that jumps off the page when looking at La Tech is their experience. Across the offense, every single one of their starters is in their third, fourth, or fifth years. Their QB is a RS Sr., and their line goes RS Sr., RS Sr., RS Jr., RS Sr., RS Sr. Texas will not be able to count on La Tech to “lose” the game. La Tech does not blow assignments or commit dumb penalties. They are assignment sound—they just aren’t extremely talented. Quarterback: La Tech returns its starter, J’mar Smith (8), from last year. He is very good at throwing La Tech’s timing routes, and they throw a LOT of them. Like the original spread offenses of the late 90s/early 2000s, La Tech relies on its timing route passing game to generate yards. It does not, generally, try for chunk yardage. La Tech is content to bite off bite-sized yardage through inside zone and screens to work its way down the field. Smith is also decent at throwing intermediate routes to the middle of the field He will buy time with his feet, but he is not a scrambler and generally does not even look to run. Smith struggles pushing the ball downfield with any accuracy. Here's an example: And another example: Smith struggles even more when he has to throw while on the run. Running Backs: La Tech has two main backs—Dancy (23) and Tucker (22)—who are virtually identical. They are shortish scat backs like we see a lot of in the Big XII. Both are good at running inside zone. Here's an example: Here's another example: Both are also used a lot in the passing game and are effective there. Wide Receivers: La Tech’s wide receivers are a mixed bag. There are times where they make fantastic plays, and there are times where they cannot even catch the ball. Their best WR last year was Hardy (who wore 6 last year but apparently is wearing 89 this year?). He is very good and will be a good test for Jalen Green. Notice here that they use WR bubble motion to bring the safety up while their X and Z run right past their defenders. Their only other returning receiver is Alfred (4), who shows up on tape as doing a good job of getting open, although he struggles with catching the ball in traffic. Defensive outlook against La Tech’s Offense: Don’t expect Texas’ defense to have a field day on Saturday. In fact, don’t count on them to be able to reliably pressure the QB at all. Almost everything La Tech does is predicated on timing routes and WR screens. The key is to focus on fundamental football and limit those plays to minimal yardage. La Tech will bail you out by having a WR drop the ball, and they’ll punt and get off the field. If Orlando gets frustrated and starts bringing the house, it could open up big plays for La Tech. Aranda got very aggressive at times against La Tech and pinned his D’s ears back. But La Tech did a nice job of always responding with a timely RB screen for chunk yardage. With that said, La Tech WILL turn the ball over—especially after completing a short pass play when their WRs try to do too much. Orlando’s unit has to be ready to capitalize on those opportunities. What to expect from La Tech’s defense? Defensive Coordinator and Scheme This is a harder breakdown, because La Tech swapped DCs last year. Their new DC is Bob Diaco, who you’ll last remember as a defensive analyst for OU last year when we played them in the cotton bowl and OU’s LB coach when we played them in the Big XII Championship (Diaco was promoted after Stoops was fired). Diaco was fired from OU at the end of the season. Most importantly, you’ll remember Diaco as the coach who invented the fake rivalry between UConn and UCF called the “Civil Conflict,” which UCF refused to recognize (including leaving the “rivalry trophy” on the field after winning the game. Historically, Diaco runs an odd front defense. Ideally, his nose guard will line up in a zero technique and two gap the center, and his ends will two gap the tackles. We’ll see if Diaco has the personnel to do that against Texas. However, La Tech’s current online roster presents as if Diaco will be running a 4-2-5 nickel defense (listing two DEs, two DTs, and two LBs). Defensive Position Players: La Tech’s defense will be experienced. Like their offense, the defense will feature starters who are all in or past their third year. Defensive Line: La Tech’s defensive line last year was boom or bust. But when they boomed, they were very booming. That line loses its two players (45—Ferguson and 99—Garner). Ferguson was a second day pick at the NFL draft. Both were replaced by upperclassmen. It’s tough to figure out what they’ll be this year against the run, given those two losses and the possibility of moving to an odd front. But last year, La Tech’s DL held up well even against a big OL in LSU. LSU was intent to run on La Tech, but La Tech held their own against LSU’s rushing attack. When they faced obvious passing situations last year, the DL’s pass rush was good. Linebackers: Again, assuming last year is an indication, expect this year’s LBs to be good in run fits. This is especially true when La Tech’s safeties assist with run responsibilities. Their strong safety, Jackson (10), jumps out on film. He plays the run like Brandon Jones. Defensive Backs: Their run defense is solid. But the DBs last year did a poor job of holding up in coverage for any length of time. The DBs often lost receivers in space. In fact, La Tech was way better at covering grass than it was at covering wide receviers. DBs lose receivers in space. Way better at covering grass than covering people. Here's an example: Here's another example: Conclusion: This is a great tune up game against a team that will have inferior talent but will not simply give the game away. Texas will have to come prepared, because La Tech is too experience to just roll over and give up. La Tech played LSU close last year in Baton Rouge (La Tech was within three points in the fourth quarter, battling back from being down 14 early in the game). If Texas plays sound assignment football, they should be able to handle La Tech. The -20.5 point spread seems pretty generous to me, but I’d obviously be thrilled for Texas to cover that, because it would really bode well for the team this year. But if Texas isn’t focused on the game and is looking ahead to LSU, this could be an uncomfortable night reminiscent of some squeakers from last season. And if Texas’ defense is too focused on making a splash play, La Tech’s sound fundamentals could lead to some frustrating extended drives. View full articl
- 42 replies
-
- 46
-
-
I used to always think LotusHorn was Bobby Burton's sock. Now I think it must be FCB's sock.
-
That stupid nickname has led to ongoing confusion among Horns fans trying to figure out the safety spots in Orlando's dime defense. Yes, Deshon Elliott nicknamed himself The Joker. Yes, Orlando's dime 3-2-6 look has a safety spot named Joker safety. No, Deshon Elliott did not play Joker in Orlando's system in 2017. Jason Hall did. John Bonney played a little, too (remember the INT against Mayfield near OU's end zone?). Then, at the end of the year Antwuan Davis was fantastic at Joker (remember the pick six against KU). Anyway, this is just a PSA from me to the universe, shouted meaninglessly into the void.
-
He is Machinator's cousin, WebMD.
-
-
I can see someone making that point. The trend lines are also consistent with someone who started Juniors and Seniors almost entirely across the board in 2017: The trend lines are also consistent with a rapidly decaying Pac 12--a down Oregon, down USC, and down Stanford. Because when you dig in, the results aren't that impressive. In 2017, WSU gave up: 44 to Boise State (albeit in 3 OT) 23 to Oregon State (who was ranked 59 in S&P+ for offense that year) 37! to Cal (who was ranked 62 in S&P+) 58! to Arizona (one of the Kalil Tate games) 41 to Washington 42! to Michigan State in the Holiday Bowl (ranked 72 in S&P+)
-
This wasn't a call out of you. Frankly, my post was consistent with yours. I was just using your post as a platform to rebut the conventional wisdom, repeated by many, that Grinch was good at WSU. He really wasn't.
-
Ignorance is bliss.
-
Sorry to quibble with you. But I'm questioning the idea (repeated by you and many others) that Grinch had even one good year at WSU. Grinch's tenure in Pullman (S&P+ defensive ranking): 2015: 77 2016: 60 2017: 30 OU's defensive stats those same years under Mike Stoops 2015: 17 2016: 31 2017: 43 That's right, Grinch was significantly worse at WSU (against much worse offenses) than OU was with Stoops. Only in one year did Grinch outperform Stoops (and only by 13 spots). That was the year that put Mike Stoops on the hot seat at OU sufficiently so that he was fired mid-season 2018. Go ahead and crown his ass.
-
I've been too busy having sex with my supermodel wife to read any of these posts.
-
That's true, although I've seen more reports saying that it was Jamison making a move than Boyce. If Boyce is the starter over Jamison, I have more confidence in Cook taking over in the 2nd Half against La Tech.
Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!