This Quinn situation is so strange to me. By all accounts and evidence, Sark runs a professional meritocracy with a focus on procedures and culture. I'm trying to wrap my head around what this would look like for any other functional title contender. If your starter is injured/hobbled, and you have a high profile backup with starter and game experience, this is a no-brainer. You sit the injured guy and play the next man up. No controversy, no rumors, just business as usual.
I have to wonder what kind of crap is going on behind the scenes to where this isn't cut and dry. When Quinn was clearly hobbled in the UK game, that was the time to sit him and play the backup. To what degree is Sark so beholden to Quinn that he can't make the obvious move there? Not even wading into the whole Quinn vs. Arch thing that has occupied so many pages on this thread, the guy was clearly injured. That was the time to play the backup. That's why you have one. Because he didn't, though, now we have to wonder if Arch is airmailing the ball in practice so bad that Sark is afraid to play him. It's either that or the Ewers family has compromising photo evidence of Sark.
Make it make sense.