No, they made a political decision, which was not supported by the Cass Review. Further, the Cass Review is seriously flawed. This, too, has been discussed upthread.
For instance, the Review is premised on the assumption that expertise in the field of transgender care makes for bias. No where else does this political slant interfere with evaluating medical research.
You are disingenuous, I suspect that is common among narcissists, which is shown in how you misrepresent the Review, and the credence you give the two people, commissioned by Review, from York University, to evaluate the existing evidence on transgender care. These two people in no way say the US medical community has gone rogue. Whether or not those two folks are identified by name, I don’t know. Many of the authors of the Cass Review are unidentified.
Your most egregious misrepresentation if the Cass Review is to claim it supports a ban on medical care for transgendered kids. It does not.
ISpoiler has the details.
How about give children the medical care they need.