Jump to content

Willfully Horn

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    5917
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by Willfully Horn

  1. Truth is, I regret this is so. I want to believe my experience as a kid left me unwilling to be intimate without a gung-ho, unquestionably willing partner. (I was five when my babysitter taught me to how to use my fingers to make her orgasm. An experience both scary and exciting). In college, I was walking home and encountered a classmate I was attracted to who was waiting for a bus well past bus hours, who declared she was very drunk. Because I held a crush, I told her to walk with me to my place, and we could use my truck to drive her home. When we got to my house, she explicitly made clear she was dtf. But, I was inhibited. I drove her home. But, I wanted to take her to bed. She died in a car wreck the next week, with her boyfriend at the wheel. And I am left to wonder what might have been. To be clear, opportunity without inhibition has always been a fact of my life, and taking selfish advantage of those opportunities is one of my regrets. But, maybe impairment doesn’t feed my ego? Or, perhaps, I aspire to not do that which was done to me.
  2. Two women together in a sexual situation is absolutely erotic. But, I’m going to stir the pot, because no one likes scorched gumbo. Certainly, there are women who are wired to be attracted to women. But, there are women who are attracted to individuals, and who are unconcerned about the gender of their attraction. Also certainly, there are men who similarly are attracted to individuals, with gender not being a factor in their affection. I am compelled to make this post after understanding the experience of Marina Navratilova, and deciding she wasn’t treated fairly by those unwilling to agree with my second paragraph.
  3. As has been stated, my understanding is that obstructions were the result of police instructions. Would be interested to learn different. Posted to thank you for the image of tent assembly, thoughI am still wondering how I can be certain that photo was taken at UT. While I am willing to concede your point, I am left wondering why your concerns are more relevant than those of the people involved. Do you join other Surly posters in dismissing the conclusions of doctors and national institutions? I have another question, concerning immigration. Do you make a distinction between immigrants seeking asylum and immigrants disregarding the law? My understanding is that asylum seekers are the reason we are witnessing immigrants overwhelming our infrastructure. Do you have evidence to the contrary?
  4. Disgusted =/= afraid. OTOH, when you’ve got to go, you go.
  5. Aside from the issue of first amendment rights, my main takeaway from this thread is whose wives would break their hips spreading for me.
  6. Let’s not overlook this:
  7. I had felt somewhat removed from news of this social development, though the rhetoric I encountered was offensive. Yesterday, I learned two adult males were set up on UT campus bringing this misogyny to light in a confrontational, demeaning, and sexually explicit sideshow. And my youngest daughter was assaulted by this depravity and delusion on a regular basis. I am less interested in counseling shortshanks than I am in kneecapping them.
  8. Youngest is in college, wife is retired, and my business is portable, though that would be an enormous hassle, but we haven’t made the decision to leave. This is our state. Moving to another wouldn’t put us beyond the darkness of imminent fascistic rule. If we move, we will become expats.
  9. Best analogy I have is scatmuncher.
  10. Maybe today’s yutes have morphed the WTO protest encampments with OG protest marches.
  11. Yeah, no. Our student athletes asked for the university to act. Calling their concerns nonsense is arrogant, and patronizing.
  12. Look into alpha-gal syndrome; it might be her opening salvo.
  13. Youngest is in her second freshman semester. She sent this text to me to illustrate what was a common event last semester, and the disconnect between the response to perceived hate speech and blatant, ongoing hate speech. I had no idea she was subjected to this shit day after day. Those two shitbird misogynists would yell at female students using vile and sexually charged derogations. She said police were often in the vicinity, but were unconcerned. Shouldn’t female students be afforded the same protection from hate speech as other groups? Those guys have left. I feel deprived of the opportunity for a righteous face to face confrontation.
  14. No argument. I’m promoting burgers, because, well, burgers. Ineptly. Sadly.
  15. Folks, visit a meat market that sells ground goat meat. Not only is goat meat a healthier choice than beef or lamb, and setting aside that folks can raise goat on grassland that reclaims desert, goat burgers are tastier than chicken, turkey, or plant based derivative burgers. Add a bit of bacon to the mince. And an egg. Experiment with different spices/flavor profile, but don’t skip on salt and pepper. Grill on high heat five minutes to a side, then let the burgers rest wrapped in foil for ten minutes, or so. You want the meat to leave the grill slightly pink in the center, and for them to lose that pink color during the rest. While I probably like beef rarer than most, goat is not beef. Goat is better when it is served medium.
  16. Texas judges would also allow deguello.
  17. Maybe I missed it in the NYT synopsis, but the rebuttal to the notion that a motivated prosecutor could indict even a presidential ham sandwich with Dijon, is that presidents are afforded abundant legal counsel, and the precedent is that if an empowered government official declares an action legal, then an individual cannot be charged, much less convicted, for that action. Who knew so many high court justices were DT posters? Holy shit, with their skin crawling they sharply rebuke any mention of the particulars of Trump’s indictments. The claim that what’s important is the abstract, the general effect of their eventual ruling. Hey fuckwads, if the meta doesn’t address this micro, then it is bullshit.
  18. The Senate majority leader, in 2020: (approximately “Convicting on impeachment charges is not necessary. We have a criminal judgement system which is the proper forum for these charges.)” Trump’s lawyer, arguing before SCOTUS: “The only remedy for illegal acts committed by POTUS is impeachment. It has been exactly so for over 240 years.” Fuck these fucks in their fucking fuckholes.
  19. Fuck me. Wrong thread.
  20. Hartzell damn well provide receipts on how UT rules were broken. But, even if he can make a credible case rules were broken, he still has demonstrated he isn’t smart enough to do his job. He called the cops, and not the fire department.
  21. Wrong thread.
  22. That’s not the complete picture. They don’t want anyone talking about tfg, (or Abbott, et al.) Just check out the year’s end thread on the board discussion board. Rex and hammer were pitching the idea imma would see big money, from oodles of snowflakes, flowing to him and Surly’s NIL, if not for the discussions in CR. Props to Imma for offering to help those disaffected millionaires set up their own Longhorn NIL deal, so they could support their university without the Surly stank. Funnily enough, they did not take him up on his offer.
  23. And folks wonder why we can’t have nice, legal, flower. Cartel, meet Dunn. Y’all have much in common.
×
×
  • Create New...