Spending $340/month does seem crazy to me. That I can’t justify in my mind. I can’t speak to that.
But as I pointed out earlier, in most cases the financial difference between cable and streaming isn’t really as big as you guys are trying to make it sound like, especially when you compare functionality apples to apples.
For example, Fubo and Max doesn’t include internet. Where I live, there’s one provider and it’s $90 per month if not bundled with cable. So that $90-$100 is now $190. I pay $240, have a bunch of movie channels, have the Astros, Rangers, Spurs, Mavs, Stars all under one remote/channel lineup. There are other advantages as well to Uverse. Adding Ballys still wouldn’t get everything and that’s another $20. Now we are up to $210-220.
So you are making it sound like streaming is hundreds of dollars of difference vs cable but it’s really not. And it still is missing significant functionality vs cable. Streaming is cheaper because it’s got less functionality and/or content and/or ease of use.
Now I’m switching to streaming in a few months after the baseball season, but the savings aren’t going to be massive. Stop making it sound like it’s utopia. It ain’t.