cactusflinthead

Editor in Chief of the National Review gets an opinion in the NYT.

8AM

Both. Sides.

I'm about to mute that fucker and play some tunes.

AHL mandating cut-resistant neckwear.

They have a nice little ratio going. Apology 1 Apology 2 How about you sit the next few plays out?

Don't you keep a sledge in the living room too?

Well, all right then. There was someone else a while back that broke through the -100 barrier and kept right on posting. At the time I thought you had removed the negative impact from CR.

Previous fuckheads got to a hundred and then they were gone. He's kept right on plowing through the barrage. I suggested earlier that perhaps BE affords you immunity. It's just as possible that negs in CR no longer count against you. Whatever the case it's apparent that they have no effect on his ability to continue trolling.

I don't think I have ever seen negative 300 something.

I see you have not been to the football board

Since he's still posting it might be possible to purchase immunity

Still from the earlier clip. We lost the weirdo from Florida on the campaign trail, but there's no shortage of replacements.

Oh yeah I have. Mechanic ain't cheap either. But, they were trash humans to fatty. That poor kid that didn't have breakfast better find a job hauling 5 gallon buckets of mud out of the hole.

It's really pretty simple. Since this is OT. I can rope in another Abrahamic religion. I'd be willing to bet that I can find the same concept in other religions as well. New International Version Whoever mocks the poor shows contempt for their Maker; whoever gloats over disaster will not go unpunished. New Living Translation Those who mock the poor insult their Maker; those who rejoice at the misfortune of others will be punished. English Standard Version Whoever mocks the poor insults his Maker; he who is glad at calamity will not go unpunished. Berean Standard Bible He who mocks the poor insults their Maker; whoever gloats over calamity will not go unpunished. No matter how you want to translate it, the least common denominator is half a sentence. Of course it can be used as a rhetorical device to dismiss entirely the remainder of another's opinions. You can't be Christian and believe this or that is most often used by the right to exclude the left. I'll use it here because I was fucking pissed off. It's been thrown in my face so many times felt good to hit back. In his case he readily admits to not being Christian and therefore not beholden to abide by any of those ideas. Atheist? Well, there are shitty atheists like there are shitty Christians, and the same applies to everyone else. I could qualify it with your a shitty Christian if you call poor people trash and value buying bombs over funding daycare, lunch, and after school programs or any of the other projects that directly impact poor trashy people. I was ready to reply to fatty earlier and I came really fucking close to adding him to the ignore bin. But, I didn't and now I'm called to defend my statement. Fine. Got dragged back in.

That's the correct handle. She has deleted the tweet, but I am still leaning towards it being a faked reply from coach.