We’ve competed for Omaha in all but 1 year. Even this year, it took the Aggies with their best two pitchers for 11 innings to beat us. And they likely don’t beat us if a top 100 MLB draft pick doesn’t make two errors in one inning. An Aggie team that has pretty much been top 5 all year using their best pitchers.
I’ll ask you what are the glaring holes?
In the starting lineup, there is not a glaring hole. You’ve got adequate defense, speed, power, hitting ability at every spot. If you want to act as though that Brown, an all conference player a year ago, is a glaring hole then more power to you. Or go with Jack O a former top 100 player, former player at another top 10 program that hit .300 last post season is a glaring hole, go ahead. Poor production yes. But there were valid reasons to think they’d produce.
Do you remember how shitty to mediocre some of Augies teams were at hitting with limited power? Clay van Hook, Robbie Hudson, David Maroul were on the 05 team. That’s one of his very best teams. The pitching staff was about 6 deep then guys you hope filled a role.
Do you know the status of other rosters? Pitching staffs don’t go 10 deep. And most rosters don’t go 9 deep with .300 hitters. It’s college baseball with limited scholarships. So limited you can’t even fill out a weekend of starters on full scholarship.
Incidentally the Aggies #2 and #3 in terms of starts had ERAs that were not good - 5.73 and 6.33. A top 5 team. Why did they start 25 combined games. Kentuckys 2 and 3 have ERAs of 4.93 and 6.24. 32 combined starts. Not a single starter has a K/IP ratio of 1 or better. Their 2nd best starter walked 51 in 88 innings. In terms of ABs, they have 3 of their top 9 at .250, .248 and .228. None of those 3 with more than 6 HRs.
My point is that what you refer to as glaring deficiencies are really more so normal. And really always have been.