Jump to content

Had Enough

Full Members
  • Posts

    3761
  • Joined

Everything posted by Had Enough

  1. The length of that review was something else too. They had the review showing on the Jumbotron with everyone watching. It does make you wonder if they were debating how not to give it to us.
  2. For 1 quarter. Scripted. Remember how we kicked KStates ass in Q1? What about Houston? OU in 2021? Do we need more examples of how 1 Q doesn’t mean shit about how a full game will go. With Ewers you can point to OU for the opposite. Sucked in Q1 then rebounded. But, yes, you’re correct. I do not recall anyone arguing otherwise.
  3. I made no declaration about what kind of player Card is. What I did was provide 3rd party data to perhaps give you a little perspective. It actually countered your initial point quite well then you resort to a different tactic. You’re fresh off using some data to support the defenses effort this past weekend. I agree with that. Basically what you’re saying is that Ewers only performances that count are this years OU and Bama. He’s 1-1.
  4. He played pretty well versus Tech and against Bama. Ewers is getting sacked at a higher rate this year than Card last year. Ewers is getting sacked at a higher clip per pressure. On average, Card threw it deeper but Ewers doesn’t hold it as long. Few, if any, get rid of it quicker than Ewers though and Card last year did not hold the ball long relative to others. Card is not having a good year, but he gets sacked less often per drop back and about half the rate of Ewers when pressured. Ewers is better this year due to being patient and more conservative. At every depth of throw Ewers comp percentage is very close to Cards last year. A big difference is that Ewers throw the intermediate throw far more often. We’re doing play action way more this year with deep throws down 40% or so.
  5. Sinnott was wide open on either 2nd or 3rd. Sometimes you get lucky; sometimes you don’t.
  6. Interestingly enough Cards numbers last year are reasonably comparable to Ewers this year.
  7. KSUs first possession. Two plays. One pass, one run first down. Then pass, run, sack. 2nd possession. 3 runs. First down. Then sack, pass, run (QB draw maybe). 3rd possession. All runs. No first downs. 4th/5th possessions. One incompletion each drive. No first downs. 6th possession. Two incompletions. No first down. Then the TD. They had no success passing early. You’re right. You come out doing what you do well. There’s no coaching fail there. Howard made a few very good throws against decent coverage. Much of their success late was not necessarily poor coverage. The Watts personal foul extended a drive that was 4th down - on broken contain no less. There were at least two if not 3 or 4 completions late that were the result of missed sacks/lack of containment. They only had two drives greater than 50 yards. They only scored on one with I believe the big 3rd down conversion being a loss of contain.
  8. Are you certain? He did come up gimpy late versus BYU. Believe he may have been the only Oline starter in at the time. I heard nothing and was surprised that he didn’t play today but wasn’t tracking it either.
  9. Looked like pass from my view. Not sure what happened.
  10. Unless I’m mistaken, Jones and Bsnks have both gotten hurt with less than 5 minutes in the game in blowouts. If so, Sark needs an assist chewing for that.
  11. He did. Probably his best overall game except the need a first down, the clock runs out drive. The 3rd down call was going to the well one too many times. And I always have a problem with no play fake, roll the QB out with a TE option in those situations.
  12. Was that not the first time the wildcat failed to convert on 4th this year? This wasn’t a goalline situation.
  13. With the proper instruction and guidance, that 85 probably turns into 95.
  14. You actually missed the part about padding his stats/grading against Rice and Wyoming because he still is playing in Q4 against inferior opponents.
  15. I guess it’s a positive I don’t know how to view who hits a negative for my posts. I wouldn’t do that if I knew how. Maybe respond in a pissy or counter tone via post but not worth it otherwise. There’s always room for good natured talk but there’s a ton of jackassery here too. Yet here I am.
  16. Then why the hell did she choose poorly?
  17. I think thatguy alluded to this previously. Talk good shit whilst online but act as little flowers when in person.
  18. I get the point. I’m not more concerned about it more than anything else is my point. The concerning things are what Bama, OU and Houston had success with against us. But I also believe OU and Houston spent extra time game planning us. I don’t recall OU or Bama or even Kansas beating us with bunch formations. Houston did, but they also beat us straight up out running us. That may have been overcompensating for some QB run.
  19. Suppose my argument would be if someone wants to replicate BYUs gameplan to a sub 5 yards per pass attempt, 6 points and 2 picks have at it. I don’t have particular concern about a bunch set that then goes to the single WR side. When we give up points, it’s most often because there’s a big play mixed in. What are Babers stats?
  20. Houston presented very different problems than others. Bu hit the deep ball to outside receivers. Bama, KU hit inside WRs isolated on safety. Maybe same versus OU. Houston did some of that too. But Houston bunched and picked some, but they also hit big ones running across the field. I’m not sure anyone except maybe TCU can replicate Houston. I’d bet KSU is going to play their game so we can match with what we do. But KSU gets guys open so it’s not like they won’t make plays.
  21. 2008 Tech was probably 2nd worst behind 2015 OSU. How soon we forget. Legit NFL defensive linemen we had.
  22. Looks like a 2 WR set. That hasn’t given us problems in the pass game. 4 man rush, 7 in coverage. Not sure we play anyone that has 2 TEs that can outrun us consistently. 4/5 wide is our issue. We don’t go dime so you’ll have a S in a tough matchup. We won’t take out Ford so if you want Hill in, it’s either LB or take out Sorrell or Burke. I’m not sure Hill is a better pass rusher than Sorrell/Burke. He’s not great in zone. If you’ve got 4 legit WRs, your best chance is a true cover guy. Personally I’m not pulling a S, but I’d prefer the additional guy be a cover guy versus the bigger body. 4-1-6 or 3-2-6. Hill provides options. We have willing tacklers in the secondary so that mitigates being small to an extent.
  23. Good stuff. Differing opinions. Speculation. Who knows. The LBs have to respect the run because there’s limited value in a tackle at 2.5 yards so your first step is likely towards the LOS. The reason I interjected Taafe is because he’s playing relatively tight and notice his first step. He’s not Cover 2 or 3 so it’s possible quarters. So maybe Holmes should lock into Man on a single side WR. Taafe coming downhill so that’s easier for him than a LB to hit that window. Irrespective of coverage, he’s too aggressive towards the LOS given down and distance. His most immediate threat is the single side WR breaking in. Holmes actions don’t make sense either. And perhaps being pulled substantiates that as well. My thought there was that perhaps Holmes action was to bait the inside throw. Just speculation though.
  24. This is one that you need to know responsibilities. It could be Taafe that messes up. Situational football. If you can’t stop them short of the first, it matters not if they 3, 5, or 7. Don’t bite up when your biggest threat is elsewhere. That’s Taafe on this play. The TE was open on the other side. Even if the S does cover him, he got himself too far outside to defend the pass.
×
×
  • Create New...