Jump to content

956 Worldwide

Full Members
  • Posts

    11964
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    26

Everything posted by 956 Worldwide

  1. America must be the most over-sexualized but deeply unsexy society imaginable. I cannot think of a less sexy thing than “slut con.”
  2. I don’t disagree at all. I think that across lots of areas but especially education we have succumbed to a kind of cargo cult mentality towards credentials that mistakes the symbol of a thing for the thing itself. We noticed that high school graduates had better outcomes than non-graduates and so we dramatically dropped standards and made it close to impossible not to graduate. A large percentage of high school graduates cannot read at near a “sixth grade level.” Close to half of graduates leave with an “A” average. We noticed that students who got As did better and so we gave out more As. Crept into college, too, and we have oodles of innumerate and barely literate bachelor holders. While high schools grades have risen, standardized test scores have fallen and so schools choose to deemphasize them. Cargo cult. The credentials were merely symbols of possessing a certain amount of ability, knowledge, and discipline. Divorced from that theu hold less and less predictive power for outcomes. Like building an airstrip in the jungle in the belief it will attract airplanes full of valuable goods.
  3. Perhaps so. I will say that “(demographic group) is failing because they have shitty parents with shitty values who don’t teach them to make good choices” has me double checking if maybe I didn’t open TexAgs Forum 16. Are people SURE that’s the exit we want when discussing disparate outcomes?
  4. NGL, if ever a statement needed some evidence this is one. I am wholly skeptical that college age boys are not applying to college because they don’t want to be around college-age girls.
  5. This thread and the take that the Left needs its own Joe Rogan makes the mind reel at the dissonance.
  6. I don’t think I’m misrepresenting you man. I’ve pointed out that in many areas, especially in broad zoom, disparity of representation is considered pretty strong evidence of explicit or implicit discrimination or barriers somewhere in the pipeline. So much so that generally the onus shifts to prove that it ISN’T the cause.
  7. My thoughts on this are complicated and I don’t disagree that we have over-credentialed a lot of work and under-valued non-credentialed work. That said, it’s not really disputable that for decades the message and policy has been that college is an important vehicle for social mobility and improvement and that it’s important to improve access to minority groups and women. It’s a hard pivot from that to “actually a bunch of you need less college.”
  8. One sector is not a good proxy for something like college. And to your point, for most of the 20th century fewer women chose to apply to college than men due to “cultural and societal factors.” That was (IMO) properly recognized as problematic and the entire educational system mobilized to shift. To this day, more boys than girls play sports due to “cultural and societal factors.” And yet we have Title IX to try and legislatively equalize that and continue to do so. When do we get to cite these factors as non-problematic?
  9. In most institutions and industries, a non-representative applicant pool is considered prima facie problematic and great pains and effort is taken to identify the deficiency and close it. It strikes me that this argument is not considered acceptable for other underrepresent groups lack of presence whether actually on campus or in the pool.
  10. You will get no argument from me that a culture of complete dependence on government largesse, a political sense of untouchability, and a feeling that “everyone else is doing it, I’m missing out if I don’t” has created a deeply corrupt set of people in high-level health care executives.
  11. I will concur with Walz that it’s likely above $1 billion. We will see where it stops. Even that figure is frankly obscene, but completely unsurprising as I’ve seen similar combinations of factors result in absurd amounts of ignored criminality. Even “only” $215 million across 77 conspirators is astonishing. It requires vast community-level complicity combined with willful ignorance at the bureaucratic level. It is extremely difficult to find 76 people willing to go in on a “defraud the government” scheme absent some very unique community factors.
  12. You also alleged that Walz was misquoted in agreeing that fraud could reach over one billion. For no reason other than than that “you couldn’t find it,” and it’s not like this is some uber lib or con rag. Anyway, here he is saying it: Clip starts at 30:35. Reporter: “Joe Thompson said that fraud could surpass one billion in Minnesota. Do you agree with that number?” Walz: “Yes.” You are correct that the Star-Tribune analysis counts formal charges in addition to guilty verdicts and pleas. (It is much easier to say that since I am not a lawyer.) So I will rework my statement: an analysis of all charges brought in RICO cases against mafia figures and the dollar amount involved would be interesting. I would never attempt to say that the figure represents something like a useful guide to mafia theft and corruption. It’s really silly to think so. And I don’t expect the Star-Tribune analysis of charges to get close to the real amount of fraud perpetrated on Minnesota DHS. So what we know is that Walz agreed that fraud could go over a billion. Now he disagrees with Thompson that it may be 9 billion. The real amount surely can’t be known. Maybe somewhere between 217 million and 9 billion we reach something that’s worth more concern than a misleading tweet.
  13. You completely misrepresented the funds being discussed and the blamed the tweet for it.
  14. This is a true and accurate accounting of the amount of fraud that’s been proven in court. The problem is that it’s not believable as even a close estimate of the actual scale, and that the time has come and gone to gather an accurate estimation. If I were describing this in an Eastern European country for a transparency NGO, I’d write: ”Corruption in the public health and welfare services in Svaty Pavel is endemic. Prosecuted cases have tallied at least $217 million over six years although there is little doubt that the accurate figure is many times that number. Due to political and social sensitivities, local officials failed to investigate credible claims for several years while national counter-corruption officials pursued only the most egregious and probable cases due to the tremendous resources required. The fraud has become a national scandal, with the populist leader seeking to exploit it for political gain. His opponents are scrambling to mount an effective response due to the gross incompetency and oversight demonstrated by the opposition party in providing oversight of state funds. A full accounting of misspent funds is likely impossible based on the scale and duration of the fraudulent activity.” The information useful. But no serious person can argue, for instance, that a successful prosecuted RICO cases represent close to a full accounting of economic losses due to mafia activity over the years.
  15. Here is Walz saying that he agrees with Thompson that there was likely in excess of one billion in fraud: https://minnesotareformer.com/2025/07/28/walz-says-he-stopped-payments-to-50-of-the-largest-housing-stabilization-providers/ When do we get to stop calling it “relatively small?” Ok, maybe it’s not nine billion but it’s more than one? I think it’s a problem for Walz that he can’t settle on a number. I have set doubt that fraud schemes is far beyond the scale Minnesota wanted to admit, and after a couple of programs were found to be overwhelmingly fake, I also don’t doubt that there are others out there. I don’t believe that the feds got all of it. I’ve been to plenty of communities where defrauding social programs is basically the only economic game in town. It’s not something that is beyond possibility and r the way Minnesota has handled its responsibilities is deeply embarrassing.
  16. Are you kidding me man? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feeding_Our_Future They simply closed the Housing Stabilization program due to fraud.
  17. Your brain appears to have gone on vapor lock here. I posted the quotes. I posted what was said and the numbers. They are there to talk about. It’s not one indicated fraud case, it’s multiple. Even Walz has said earlier this summer he won’t be surprised if there is over a billion dollars in Feeding our Future fraud alone: It’s a red flag to you if looking at the claims there are more problems than legitimate providers across these 14 services? Why? All of Feeding our Future was fraudulent. Basically all of the Housing Stabilization program is fraudulent. Over half of the new autism centers opened up were fake. It’s already happened and been indicted. These are shocking numbers for a first-world, high-trust nation. Unbelievable, even. But that’s not what we are talking about now.
  18. I will fully agree that Weiss’ editors are shit. The first sentences should have been: ”Minnesota is auditing approximately $18 billion spent since 2018 across 14 Medicaid programs that were designated “high fraud risk. A U.S. prosecutor says that up to $9 billion may have been fraudulently spent.”
  19. @Dahobbs you are 100 percent reading it wrong because you looked at the Tweet and not the article. It is not possible to continue until you back down and admit that. Clicking through. Which you are allowed to do. The claim by the attorney is that up to half of payments since 2018 across 14 services already deemed high-risk may be fraud. Maybe it’s bullshit, but that’s the claim. Minnesota’s annual Medicaid payout was a bit over 18 billion in 2024. So over six years, about a sixth of that was spent in programs that Walz determined high-fraud risk. And the allegation from the AAG is that maybe half of that was fraud.
  20. Well, for one you’re reading the article wrong. It alleges that 9 billion is part of 18 billion being examined since 2018. Minnesota spends about 19b per year. So the real percentage under question is less than 10 percent of total payouts. Second, the 18 billion over six years is in programs already deemed high-fraud risk, listed below. The state has seen over double the amount of payouts under some of these balloon since the pandemic. Lots of people not reading carefully and responding to a scenario they made up.
  21. Working with Ukraine will make you extremely sanguine about this stuff. First, if you lift up one corner of the rock and find the largest pandemic relief scam, you can be certain that lifting the rest will be a nightmare. That is not “small fraud,” it’s massive fraud and an indicator of deeper issues. If anyone wanted to enter a business deal with a Ukrainian group, I’d have to warn them that Ukraine is a high-fraud country and that a century of Soviet or Russian direct/indirect rule had created a culture of seriously different ethics and business norms. That corruption became so pervasive that most people who even tried to be honest would look the other way because of its centrality to how things work. I’d warn you to do extra fact-checking, extra diligence, and still be prepared to lose money along the way. If you were prepping a similar deal with Danes, I’d tell you to you could likely believe every word you heard and that you should prep to be more transparent and honest yourself. It’s a radically different culture and norm. That the concept of “a favor” doesn’t exist. I cannot afford to be stupid and naive when explaining differences in norms and risks when making judgments about how to work with different foreign groups. Somali culture is clannish and insular and shaped on ethical norms even more foreign than Ukrainian. The community is virtually all on state assistance. It is not at all surprising that there is high fraud there. A bit of extra scrutiny on these programs and payouts based on where they would go, up front, could save a lot of heartburn later. Stupidity and naïveté should not be confused with virtues.
  22. No, there is not an overwhelming number of Somali doctors. The fraud is in that community because basically the entire community is on Medicaid. And this FactCheck flagged another hundred million or so. https://www.factcheck.org/2025/12/probing-trumps-verbal-attack-on-somalis/
  23. We’ve gone from “maybe a couple million” upthread to over $250 already. A few hundred million here, a few hundred million there— pretty soon maybe it isn’t small-time fraud?
  24. It seems like the admin is trying to use a real and known fraud issue to score political points. I will not be surprised if there is a lot more uncovered although as can been seen here, the way they peruse these announcements raises reasonable doubt as to scope and purpose. The Biden DOJ identified what it called “the largest pandemic fraud scheme uncovered to date” in Minn. $250 million for fake meals for kids. Also in 2024, the FBI came down on a interlinked autism center scam. There is massive fraud in this area. Both of these links and the initial investigations began before DJTII. https://www.valleynewslive.com/2024/12/14/2-minnesota-autism-centers-raided-by-fbi-part-wider-fraud-investigation/?outputType=amp https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feeding_Our_Future I believe at this point something like 68 of 70 defendants in these schemes were Somali. Amazing to deny that stuff like this can’t take off and become a major issue in a particular ethnic enclave. Waiting to hear that La Cosa Nostra never existed and was just anti-Italian prejudice all along.
  25. Three points at home, game called by an OC who has been by admission doing more work for another school. Masterful gambit Elko.
×
×
  • Create New...