yeah, i saw when you typed that the first time. 1.2% is not some vaccine efficacy rate. do you not understand that? it isn't a "you only had a 1.2% chance of dying if you were vaccinated but you weren't so you died anyway stat" which is something you seem to believe. you can't multiply 1.2% times 600000.
it is the ratio of deaths of vaxxed to not. how many people are vaccinated in UK? how many are not? do you not understand how those figures appear in that 1.2% rate? that's why i drew out the extreme example. math lends itself to testing on the extremes because algebra is algebra whether it is the fat of the bell curve or not.
what if i told you 56% of covid deaths are men, 44 are women. that's kind of interesting.
what if i told you less than 1% of covid deaths are zoroastrians. wow, should we all convert?! wait. no. maybe that number is influenced by something other than Mazdayasna's natural production of antibodies, i'd bet.
for whatever reason your built in understanding of population distributions above isn't making its way into your brain about vaccination.