Jump to content

mwaadeeb

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    1444
  • Joined

Everything posted by mwaadeeb

  1. If we win out, definitely. I hear you about Georgia. Why should we get in the playoffs when we'd normally be in the Holiday Bowl or wherever? But if we battle and come up just short and then wreck Arky and Aggy (still undefeated), who else on the bubble will have our chops? We'll see.
  2. Because (if we play Georgia tough and beat Arky / A&M) we're not just a weird, inconsistent team with talent, but a team with a clear trajectory, whose QB could be entering a period of greatness and and whose shitty O-line might be coming its own (I hope), giving us a cool narrative and real shot.
  3. NM / Removed for making no sense.
  4. I think his point was that they struggled, too.
  5. Normally if we lost three I'd say fuck it we don't deserve it and can't win it all anyway. Not this time.
  6. Sounds like she took you to the cleaners.
  7. They came at me, hos. Except for Tex Pete who called the guy agreeing with me a bitch. And I am a lawyer, if going to law school and passing bar count.
  8. So that wasn't about the fix? This whole thread is full of people saying the call was fishy and pondering who could be behind it. I just think he missed it, and the booth couldn't be sure in the moment, and we got screwed.
  9. I, of course, disagree, but that isn't the point I've been trying (and failing) to make, which is: if you believe this was a conspiracy against Texas, you are dumb.
  10. Sounds like you got your feelings hurt, sorry he said that so hurtfully.
  11. I'd beat you 9/10 and I never practiced law.
  12. You literally told me to go fuck myself, lol. The picture we see is all we need to see. You'd make a terrible lawyer.
  13. The larger point is that we're having this "dispute," wouldn't you say?
  14. You can see him pull back on the video. You can't see exactly where it happens. So I still don't get it.
  15. The picture we're all looking at from the closest sideline is him reaching out at his farthest point and it's not at the pylon.
  16. Why are you saying the closest the ball was to the plane was "at the pylon" when the player stuck the ball out well before the pylon?
  17. I disagree with your premise. The ball went closest to the plane a few feet away from the pylon.
  18. I don't know what you're talking about, honestly. The pylon shot was through a distorted lens (yes, slightly offset) and not dispositive. The best shot was from the ref's POV and it was super-close (I still think it was a bad call, should have gone to the D).
  19. Because it's good to push-back sometimes against the narratives our mouth-breathings fans like to create about conspiracies against us, which make us look fucking stupid.
  20. That first shot shows you how close it was, how the laces may be touching, and that the ref might (low percentage IMO) could have been correct. The last one (the "Offset" one) isn't about being offset (though the camera is offset a little), it's about the wide angle distortion. There was enough fuckery from the refs to not think this one was a set up. And it's very easy for Sark to lodge a complaint and satisfy the rubes in his fanbase. Edit for your edit: I'm posting about it the next day, when morons like you are still calling it some kind of conspiracy.
  21. Listen, nimrod [edit, not on you Chopper; I thought this was Burnt Eyes, who'd just told me to GFU], the angle of the ref showed it was close. He made the call (shitty call IMO). They didn't overturn. Get over it.
  22. On the 2-pointer: I know it's emotional, but the high angle (@ the ref's POV) showed the laces possibly breaking the plane, which would make it a score, and since the ref was right there and quickly called it a score, they weren't going to overturn the call on the field. So just shut up about it.
  23. Maybe not IFFFFF they beat Georgia today.
  24. Sark did not look happy after that TD, must be going to the NFL.
  25. It's high time we mudhole somebody.
×
×
  • Create New...