Balcones

You left out the part that this was updated on Jan 24, 2024, after the defense filed a motion to have Wade removed based on his interrogatory responses from May 2023. See page 3. Subsequently, Wade quickly settled this divorce case out of court days after these responses.

I know the legal system is hard to understand for most.

He didn't have to give an affirmative answer. He could have responded with some like, "Plaintiff objects to this rog because it is ambiguous and fails to identify the information sought with particularity to "marriage"....." This is what happens 99% of time. I assume he and his attorney did that on the December 2021 rogs, and subsequently, until it was ultimately ordered to give an affirmative response. That's how they finally answered in May 2023, "none".

Sadly, just blew a 93 mph fastball by Gasparino

Hew answered, “none”. There is nothing misleading about that answer. This is ONE example of the Special Prosecutor, against a President of The United States, lying under oath, to a court in Georgia. That matters.

Page 2. Black and White. https://www.fultonclerk.org/DocumentCenter/View/4025/93-MOTION-02-13-2024

You’ve been given plenty. You asked for proof of is lying on rogs (up to present) and I have given you video and excerpts from lawfare.

Take, for example, a May 2023 interrogatory that asked Wade to disclose any sexual relations he had during his marriage, including during the “time of separation” and “up to the present.” In his interrogatory response at that time, Wade answered “none.” But on the stand last week, Wade acknowledged that he had engaged in sexual relations with Willis by May 2023. In explaining his response to the interrogatory, Wade maintained that his marriage was “irretrievably broken” in 2015 and, as such, he did not have a relationship with anyone during the course of his marriage. But that explanation does not account for the fact that the interrogatory asked for conduct during the “time of separation” and “up to the present.” As one Georgia family law attorney told us: “Wade’s ‘definition’ of the end of his marriage being when it was irretrievably broken years ago is legal bullshit.” There are similar problems with other interrogatories in the divorce proceedings. In the May 2023 interrogatory, for example, Wade was asked to identify “any and all” occasions in which he entertained a member of the opposite sex “from date of marriage to the present.” Wade again answered “none.” Confronted with this interrogatory by defense counsel last week, Wade agreed that he had “entertained” Willis in May 2023. But he insisted on a strained interpretation of the question posed, claiming that he did not entertain anyone during the “course of the marriage”—a qualifying phrase that appears nowhere in the question or Wade’s response.

She crushes him the entire 20 min.

No. December 2023.

You are checkers man, I can tell. As soon as she asked that question and he gave an answer, he opened the door for the defense to subpoena his business tax records. And his answers under oath, will be cross with the tax records.

It was certainly enough for the defense to get a judge to hear their argument (as has already happened). And as you have noted, once the string is pulled, chances to perjure yourself, access to more evidence, conflicting statements under oath, more embarrassing discovery, more subpoenas, etc… is not good for the DA and SP. The longer the judge allows them to be the persecutors on this case, the deeper the defense will dig. Based on what has been discovered so far, I doubt it gets better for Willis/Wade.

Willis hired her boyfriend (relationship started before willis hired Wade) to be special prosecutor. Wade is paid with taxpayer money. Wade, using his business account, took Willis on several trips (Aruba, Bahamas, Napa). Wade claims he was paid back in cash, but has no records and did not report on his business taxes that these were personal or reimbursed business expenses. This, he used his earnings from the job Willis gave him to take her on multiple trips.

Lawrence Julius Taylor Jr., 33, of Powder Springs, entered a guilty plea the day his trial was to begin. It doesn’t say anywhere in the Article who Taylor’s lawyer was, but I’m assuming you think it’s Wade? He didn’t even see the inside of a courtroom on this case, no?

Are we ignoring the witnesses (former DA employee and former law partner) testimony that the relationship began before Wade was hired as SP? Are we ignoring Wade’s divorce case interrogatories claiming he has not entertained opposite sex up to present? There is plenty of evidence. You just don’t want to acknowledge it.

Dekalb or Clayton Counties will 100% bring this case if Fulton is disqualified. Spare me the venue shopping or geography lesson.

Full of shit? Go to the 14 min mark of that video. Any county, any DA can bring this case.

He was VERY clear that another county or another DA could bring this case to trial. He said it verbatim.

He handles traffic tickets, dog bites, and real estate contracts his entire career. Preparing and qualifying him to be the special prosecutor in a felony RICO case against a former President and current Presidential candidate? Really?

No. Read up thread. Someone said Wade was highly qualified to be the special prosecutor. I’m showing his lack of experience.

From NCJA.Org In the fall of 2021, Nathan Wade had little experience prosecuting criminal cases in the Atlanta area, serving as a municipal judge who mostly dealt with traffic tickets and running a private practice that focuses on family law and contract disputes. Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis chose him to lead the biggest case of her career, a two-and-a-half year investigation charged former president Trump and more than a dozen co-defendants with illegally conspiring to overturn the 2020 election in Georgia. Willis’s decision to hire Wade is now facing scrutiny after a Trump co-defendant alleged that the two prosecutors are lovers who have vacationed together on Wade’s dime in Napa Valley and the Caribbean. The accusation could present a conflict of interest or could amount to fraud, reports the Washington Post.

From Washington Post: Originally from Texas, Wade moved more than 20 years ago to attend Atlanta’s John Marshall School of Law. He stayed in the area after graduation, beginning his legal career as a prosecutor for the Cobb County solicitor general, which handles traffic tickets and other misdemeanor cases, according to a campaign biography. He then worked as a prosecutor for “several municipalities” in Cobb County before transitioning to private practice, where he primarily handled family law, contract and civil litigation cases

From Forbes: Since his hiring, however, Wade has faced accusations that his experience did not qualify him for the lead prosecutor position in the Trump case, with Trump co-defendant Michael Roman arguing in a lawsuit against Willis that Wade’s “lack of experience” does not meet Fulton County standards “given the complexity of the charges.” Before joining the prosecution in Fulton County, Wade worked as a prosecutor and later as a judge in suburban Cobb County handling low-level criminal cases, the New York Times reported, citing “scant evidence” of his record prosecuting major cases and no evidence of his work on a major political corruption case similar to the one Trump faces in Georgia. Wade’s record as a prosecutor primarily involves criminal defense and personal injury cases, multiple outlets reported, while his law firm, Wade & Campbell, lauds him as a “zealous advocate” with experience representing clients after major car accidents and contract disputes. Wade, who graduated from John Marshall Law School in Chicago (now part of the University of Illinois at Chicago), has also served as an assistant county solicitor—a position that handles misdemeanor cases—and ran unsuccessfully on three occasions for a seat on the bench of the Cobb County Superior Court between 2012 and 2016.

Can you cite a case? The AJC was not able to find a felony case has been involved in. Misdemeanor? Yes. Civil? Yes. Felony? No.