Jump to content

Balcones

Full Members
  • Posts

    1198
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Balcones

  1. It has exposed what Willis and Wade are willing to do in court. And if they are willing to lie under oath in this case after being embarrassed by their own actions, they shouldn’t be trying the case. Lots of others that can bring the case to the court.
  2. Yes. And it will get litigated. But not by Willis and Wade.
  3. You don’t think lying to the court, under oath, by the DA and Special Prosecutor is a big deal? Is Perjury not a felony in Georgia?
  4. How is anyone expected to get a fair trial when both the DA and Special Prosecutor lie under oath in the process? At this point, is there any doubt they lied to the court? Other people can bring the charges and try the case against Trump, but if these two will lie to the court over an affair, why would do you think they be truthful on everything else?
  5. The Disch was as dead as I have ever seen it this weekend.
  6. I’m assuming there is at least 1 other attorney in Georgia that has prosecuted a felony case.
  7. According to her testimony it was at least before they went on the trips. He continues to be the special prosecutor today.
  8. How do I know when Wade learned of Wade’s views? What?
  9. I’m pretty sure it’s working in his favor.
  10. You don’t need to worry about that. Wade is grossly under qualified. He has never prosecuted a felony case, is primarily a personal injury lawyer, and has no experience with RICO. https://www.ajc.com/politics/misconduct-allegations-lead-to-scrutiny-of-fulton-trump-prosecutor/5DB2F5T6ANHEHFQ5RFWJ2SG4N4/
  11. What part isn’t true? They both admit that they have a sexual relationship with each other under oath. They both admit to taking trips to Napa Valley, Aruba, Bahamas, etc…. Multiple witnesses testified under oath this relationship pre-dated Willis hiring Wade. She has hired him to be the special prosecutor and paid him $700k.
  12. Fani has already been disqualified from one of the cases. Burt Jones. Proving that the bar isn’t that high to prove the conflict. Georgie legal precedent has found there is a conflict of interest when a personal interest or stake in a defendants conviction exists. Hiring her boyfriend paying him money and then him using the money where she benefits isn’t a stretch of the imagination.
  13. I’m sure if you were the defendant in the case, you would tell your lawyer not to go after this. That this is totally on the up and up and what she did is not a conflict and to leave her alone.
  14. She hired her boyfriend to investigate a case and she personally benefited from the taxpayer money she paid him with. You may not think that is a issue, but the defense does. And apparently the court does too, or they would just dismiss the motion. If you were the defendant, you certainly could just let it go and not make it an issue.
  15. If he is guilty, I’m sure there is a range of penalty. What is the State asking for/recommending in their motion?
  16. I don’t think anyone is saying if Wade/Willis perjured themselves, violated campaign laws, tax laws, received improper benefits, etc… then Trump is not guilty. Someone else can try the case or bring the case again.
  17. She is the prosecutor and he is the lead investigator. She selected him for this case and personally benefitted from the public money she paid him.
  18. I see. She claims she only started fucking/traveling with him after she appointed him to the $700k contract using public money, therefore didn’t know beforehand that she would benefit from the $$. Other witnesses say she was fucking/traveling with him before she gave him the public money contract and therefore knew she would then benefit from the money. Lying to the court establish the first scenario, matters.
  19. Lying to court under oath as the DA? That doesn’t matter?
  20. As for the non-legal stuff? There is so much she opened up when getting on the stand. Example- Willis claims, under oath, that Wade thinks women are only good for making him a sandwich (which may be true). The had several arguments about how she and tried to convince him they were equals. She will now have to defend why she hired someone she knew had those views.
  21. For Willis: under oath she claims the relationship started after she hired Wade. Other witnesses, say they started before. This timing is very relevant to the underlying issue. Lying to the court would certainly be illegal. I’m sure, if judge allowed for broader discovery, texts/emails would prove either way 100%. For Wade: same thing as above. Additionally, he provided answers to the court in his divorce case that he now contradicts to this court. As example, he either did or did not entertain opposite sex up to the present. In divorce court he states no in this court he says yes. If someone wants to dig deeper, there are probably other issues (not accounting for trips/cash payments on business account properly), campaign account claims (taking cash out), etc… With stakes this high, someone is going to pull on all of these strings if they both stay on this case. They are both really sloppy for this high profile of a case.
  22. Where is visiting team bullpen now?
  23. Thanks. It’s up now.
  24. Is the a box score anywhere?
Ă—
Ă—
  • Create New...