Hadn't seen that clip even if a year old. But when the narrator says "that's something that is hard to wrap our head around", in reference to net zero oil, that kind of sums up the PR challenge. Anthropogenic CO2 for both permanent sequestration and enhanced oil recovery is, in theory, a very practical way for an oil company to approach this era of net zero emission goals. Whether they be pie-in-the-sky or not is another topic IMHO.
But why many lay persons with the loudest and most ardent followers are still so negative on net zero oil, assuming it can truly be done economically, is baffling to me. It's simple mass balance. We will see how successful or not Oxy will be at it but if it works, it could unlock massive reserves in areas where current secondary recovery is just not practical because there's no CO2 source. It just needs to not be a money drain, obviously.
Maybe people don't understand that CO2 EOR projects are a thing and that we have to actually drill for and pipe the CO2 long distances. IDK...it's not a silver bullet but it's one good piece of the puzzle.