Disagree-they have multiple governors and legislators with the personal charisma. As James Carville has said, they have a lot of young upcoming talent, they just haven’t been the ones in charge.
I might have agreed with the sentiment that Mayor Pete just needed more seasoning and would be a great candidate, but this election should be a wake-up call that anyone culturally conspicuous is out of the mainstream. And this goes for women, too.
One of the PSA boys said this the day after but everyone else seems too afraid to repeat it (including PSA)-this should be the last female nominee they run for a while. You’ve had two elections in which that’s been rejected.
Also, everyone that cares about the deficit are currently hiding in the MAGA shadow and are unlikely to constitute a significant contribution to the next Dem coalition.
Sarah Longwell on today’s PSA talked about survey groups she ran and finally answered a question that I’ve been asking myself. “What’s a more consolidated theory of what comes next?” She stated that change candidates are likely the voters preference going forward as we in the west settle into something of an institutional malaise (so this isn’t just the US). She imagines a Presidency where the incumbent always loses, a Congress where the party out of power regains it every two years, and voters who are never happy with anyone. She places the blame on the prevalence of social media, connectivity via our phones, and the pervasive sense both help create that “those people over there have it better than me and that pisses me off.”
I thought that was interesting because I think Bernie’s “we need to appeal to working people more” only scratches at the real issue. David Brooks writes about this kind of thing all the time, in which he concludes current politics isn’t nurturing the soul. The Democrats have a great opportunity over the next couple of election cycles to build a movement that doesn’t require a black man with a funny name and once in a lifetime charisma to take back the Presidency.