I guess it speaks to the stubbornness of college coaches and coordinators when something is beyond obvious to some watching the game yet the particular coach wants to stick to his game plan. Miami has been successful with straight runs between the tackles. They want to spam Toney yet Aggie is keying in on him, why not switch to using him as a decoy.
I’ve had Gameday on for the last 30 minutes in the background passively listening. But have they completely ignored what happened in the last game Aggie played? They reference this team as if they are damn near unbeatable. If Miami can keep Reed in the pocket and contain those WRs they’ll win this game.
I know we weren’t a perfect team but I do know neither of these teams are better than us, and we proved that against one them on the field. Too bad getting into the playoffs is a win-loss beauty pageant. Sucks having to watch two ass teams compete in the playoffs. Then do it all over again the first game tomorrow.
I think you have me confused with someone that cares about “what ifs” or someone that puts more emphasis on what happened during the game instead of the game result. Watching us win games with you must be painful for all those involved.
We beat Vandy, who was mostly held in check until we suffered more injuries in the secondary, we beat Arky who had one of the top offenses and scored points on just about everyone, Kentucky scored 13 points, who gives a fuck what they did otherwise. Georgia was more of a scheme issue IMO. Did I claim they were one of the best units in the country? No. Did I claim it was always pretty? No. But they weren’t as bad as some of you are purporting. They were good enough and not at the top of the list of reasons we didn’t make the playoffs.
I guess some of you had higher expectations for the secondary than you should have. All things considered they weren’t that bad. And IMO only cost us one game in which Manny didn’t play and we got beat/punked by a WR we had no tape on.
Not the coaching news I was expecting at all. I appreciate everything PK did here but I’m not sad to see his style of defense go even if it was effective 90% of the time.
I’d bet on Mahomes being able to operate from the pocket if it comes to that. I also thought they underutilized Worthy, seems they use him more as a decoy than anything else. IMO the issue with the Chiefs is that Reid’s offense has just gotten stale. He needs to do some reinventing as well.
Even if you only seen Reed play the two times he has lost against Texas, do you honestly believe someone could watch that kid throw and become so enamored they just have to play with that guy? I’m pretty sure he went to A&M because of the large sum of money they were offering.
Simple is better.
Just take the top 16 ranked teams. No need for auto bids as I’m sure that would encompass the necessary conference champions. If we have to throw the mid majors a bone then they can have one auto bid to the highest ranked conference champion.
This response is still disingenuous. Wingo is boom or bust I can admit that. I can also admit taking him off the field likely makes us even worse on offense. Also Sark calls a play and the team has to execute it. Arch has numerous passing options on said play. He threw the ball to the guy that managed to get open. I doubt very seriously Sark is directly telling Arch to throw the ball to Wingo on crucial downs in the headset.
Oregon and Ole Miss(even without Lane) should completely annihilate their opponents. And hopefully that makes the powers that be reconsider this G5 nonsense. That is the real issue here. Maybe remove the automatic qualifier for conference championships altogether and just take the 12 best teams. Which I doubt would ever really affect the Big10 and SEC champion anyway.
So you get on your soapbox to call others out for pushing agendas just for you to turn around and do the same thing. We get it, everything is Sark’s fault, including a WR inexplicably tripping over his own feet on a play he has previously executed numerous times and in another instance dropping a routine catch.