![](https://www.surlyhorns.com/board/uploads/set_resources_29/84c1e40ea0e759e3f1505eb1788ddf3c_pattern.png)
statsman
Full Members-
Posts
3506 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Recruiting - 2020
2019-2020 Football Season
Football
Entertainment
Sports
News and Business
Cloak Room
Transfer Portal
Recruiting
Events
Everything posted by statsman
-
Perspective- the Russian total population for WWI was 160M. They had 2M KIA in WWI (WWII was worse). The casualties from Ukraine are horrific to a modern, free country, but don’t expect it to drive change in Russia.
-
My larger point stands. This league is just fine with generational talent finding its way to the Lakers.
-
“NBA justification in approving this trade”? Easy. It’s the Lakers. Wilt finished with the Lakers. Kareem finished with the Lakers. Shaq spent most of his later career with the Lakers. LeBron is finishing with the Lakers.
-
NCAA enforcement always relied on the schools submitting to it. That worked for decades. Then, Auburn (Can Newton) and TAMU (Manziel) said, in response to (well substantiated) NCAA allegations of cheating - “we’ll see you in court”. The NCAA has always been toothless without the schools willingly submitting. If there are ever to be rules, again, the enforcement body will have to be submitted to, willingly. My guess is that the rules will have to be set and enforced by whoever is distributing the money.
-
Cutting the workforce (although- I would be in favor of a constitutional amendment barring unionization of any federal employees, including the postal service and military) won’t solve the budget issues. the dollars aren’t there. Cutting defense, even in half, won’t do it, either. The $$ aren’t there. It will take entitlement reform. That won’t happen until it has to happen, politically. (The GOP proposed a SS plan in 2005; the Dems used that as a scare to win the mid terms. The Dems have an announced SS plan involving minute increases in FICA and phased delays of retirement- they have never proposed it as legislation). The U.S. has one “get out of budget spiral hell free” card. The U.S. government is unique among nations in that it (the government) owns a ridiculous amount of land. It can sell some prime location military reservations and national parks and raise a couple trillion, when the shit hits the fan.
-
If there were an NFL style draft of college football players, would Colin Simmons would go in the top 5? I think so.
-
Transfer Cycle 2024-2025 - Handjob Helobious Is the Man!
statsman replied to closetojumping's topic in 🤫$9.95🤫
Georgia will be OK. Resource and alumni-wise, they are in the upper echelon of the SEC, plus that state is producing a ton of elite talent now, compared to 25 years ago. They don’t have Aggies, and their neighbor state rival doesn’t have to poach recruits from them to stay competitive. It is fun to see Texas approach its potential, though. -
Yeah, clearly, OU’s recruiting hasn’t taken a step up, nor has Texas taken a step down. Is it because OU doesn’t know how to allocate the funds, yet, between sports and players? Have their donors said they are out once AD money is in? I don’t know and am hoping someone can shed light on
-
On Sooner Scoop, they are reporting that tomorrow’s OU regents meeting has a vote to approve transfer of funds from the AD to the OneOklahoma NIL fund, pursuant to the Okie governor’s executive order.
-
I can’t argue with you, and I am very disappointed in where the U.S. seems to be on this. Ukraine needs Europe to step up, but I don’t know that they can. Internal politics makes it hard for the UK, Germany and France to make the required commitment and EU budgetary requirements (designed to support the Euro as a currency) gives all but the UK an excuse to not mobilize. You could argue that they are behaving worse than they did 1936-1938. Mark Twain is said to have stated, “History doesn’t repeat, but it does rhyme”. It’s certainly rhyming now. The only saving grace is that Russia has a schitzkrieg, instead of a blitzkrieg.
-
Is it less cost efficient than the future we will be in, if Ukraine loses?
-
-
I don’t know, so much, that “we” includes the U.S., anymore Three years ago, Russia was in a similar position to NATO, with respect to artillery production. As their initial schitzkrieg stalled, and the war settled into its current form, they also realized they needed more shells. Like Ukraine, they scrounged for shells from partners and used up stores. They also committed to production expansion. Now, Russia has all the shells they need, as inaccurate and unreliable as they are. As Stalin said, “Quantity has a quality of its own”. NATO/ the west/the U.S. could have matches (and exceeded!) Russia. Look at this list of ranked economies: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nominal) Russia has the 11th largest. I count five NATO nations with larger economies, individually. The reason that Ukraine’s allies aren’t giving more shells to Ukraine is not that they aren’t capable. It is that they prioritized other things higher. Russia can win this. If Ukraine’s allies continue to twiddle their thumbs and look at each other to take the lead, the Ukrainian defenses can collapse. If that happens, you will see a flood of refugees. Russia’s economy is a mess- high inflation, collapsing currency, high interest rates. Funny fact- Germany’s economy was similar in 1938: with the economic growth from rearmament stalling out, there were too many marks chasing too few goods (industry was hindered by troop mobilization). Taking Czechoslovakia solved the German economic problems; now there were plenty of good for the marks to purchase. The same thing can save Russia’s economy. The “west” better decide tout suite if that kind of future is unbearable. The time for doing something about it is almost past.
-
In 1941, before Pearl Harbor, the U.S. realized it needed bombers, lots of them. It signed a contract with Convair to buy as many B-24’s as they could build, 39 per month. As the U.S. entered the war, it realized it needed more, so Convair doubled production by building a new plant in Fort Worth (that’s why locals of a certain age still call it “the Bomber Plant”, even though it has built fighters for almost 60 years). Knowing that still wouldn’t be enough, the Army signed Ford to build bombers in their Willow Run plant (war time rationing pretty much starved civilian car production). The Convair engineers struggled to conceive of higher rate production, while Ford engineers struggled to imagine production as slow as a bomber per day. By the spring of 1944, 2.5 years after Pearl Harbor, Willow Run was completing one B-24 per hour, 24 hours per day, seven days per week. Each B-24 weighed 18 tons, empty, had four engines and tens of thousands of hand bucked rivets. That was 80 years ago. This year, we are about to see a different kind of motivated development program, as the U.S. takes on the AI challenge from China. We have seen Lunar missions planned and executed in 10 years. We have seen a vaccine to a novel virus developed in eight months. Maybe I don’t know what I’m talking about (but I think I do). It wasn’t funding that kept the U.S. (or the UK, or Germany or France) from matching Russia in artillery shell production (remember- the Russkis had to ramp up to their current level). It was funding and commitment.
-
Same answer as 2.5 years ago: when Ukraine has as many (better- more) artillery shells as the Russians have. The U.S. has the industrial capacity to produce that many, but it would require a financial commitment. Europe has the industrial capacity as well, but that would require a financial commitment. There are political reasons that one of Ukraine’s backers have stepped up, basically domestic butter prioritized over Ukraine guns. Politicians are really good at explaining why something is someone else’s responsibility. Also- the major European national governments all seem near collapse and are walking a fine line. I think their calculations are wrong. Know what’s going to cost more than arming Ukraine at a higher level than Russia? Defense costs if the Ukrainian defense collapses and Russia breaks through. If that happens, there will be millions of Ukrainian refugees (the Ukrainians know what Russia does- they rape the women, shoot the men and send the children east). With Russia farther west, the Euros will be forced to increase annual defense higher than a measly 2% of GDP.
-
"Saturday Night" - movie about 1975 SNL
statsman replied to Chuckie Finster's topic in Movies and TV
Yes, even that “gentle soul” David Bowie had a 13 year old fuck buddy in LA. You can’t say “it was the ‘70s”. I was alive back then and k ew it was wrong. -
Dallas Cowboys 2024 Season Thread -- Jerrah the Asshat Rides Again
statsman replied to Patrick Bateman's topic in Football
Game respects game. The players respect Jones’ ability to get out of the house and chase strange at an advanced age. That’s all. -
"Saturday Night" - movie about 1975 SNL
statsman replied to Chuckie Finster's topic in Movies and TV
I have a 15 year old daughter. I don’t trust 15 year old boys, and my level of distrust rises exponentially with the age of any suitor. -
"Saturday Night" - movie about 1975 SNL
statsman replied to Chuckie Finster's topic in Movies and TV
Yes, it’s often the case that 20 year old men are romantically interested in 14 year old girls because they are looking for a soulful meeting of minds. -
"Saturday Night" - movie about 1975 SNL
statsman replied to Chuckie Finster's topic in Movies and TV
Well, she was in junior high school when they met. He had graduated HS. -
"Saturday Night" - movie about 1975 SNL
statsman replied to Chuckie Finster's topic in Movies and TV
I was in junior high. We’d stay up late (11:30 in Georgia’s time zone) and watch, and then I’d rehash it with buddies in home room on Monday. WRT Shuster- she explains the Michaels relationship, which the Wiki bio details just make sound more creepy. Lorne Nichaels is six years older, and she was 17 when they married. He was a 20 year old dating a 14 year old. -
Negative Recruiting Your Own School: The aggy Screenshot Megathread
statsman replied to texifornia's topic in 🤫$9.95🤫
It is so incredible: -their basketball team blew a 22 point lead, and… -what really has them upset is a comment from an announcer. -
Negative Recruiting Your Own School: The aggy Screenshot Megathread
statsman replied to texifornia's topic in 🤫$9.95🤫
They are so precious. The TV announcer said nice things about the home team in a college basketball game. Like all announcers do about all home teams in all college basketball games. Including A&M’s. And they are convinced that the nice things said at their home games are the truest of true, and things said when the Ags on the road, about the home team, are insidious comments designed to hurt the Ags. -
Mack Brown Tarheel Football: The Orange Slice Boogaloo
statsman replied to Machinator's topic in Football
Jamail was Mack’s lawyer, a huge donor to the university and, yes, he insisted on better terms for Mack than his contract called for. -
Mack Brown Tarheel Football: The Orange Slice Boogaloo
statsman replied to Machinator's topic in Football
I’m repeating an earlier post, but here goes: Darrell Royal was encouraged to retire. He accepted the emeritus position after UT hired his successor at HC and AD without listening to input from DKR. Yet, over the next three plus decades, Royal worked as needed to help UT (the school even more than the football program). Several university presidents remarked on how delighted they were that Royal was never working his own agenda, and only offering input when asked. Brown’s collapse as an effective HC happened at a bad time for the university. Perry was trying to transform UT much as he was doing to TAMU. Powers, the president, was in a tough spot, trying to keep his position while not acceding to the governor’s (and the most recent Perry selected regents, some of whom were booster of other schools) demands. Instead of working with Powers, or even staying out of the political squabbling, Brown actually took advantage of the bickering to try to leverage more time. It damn near worked. That’s the problem with Brown. We know how he sees his importance with respect to the program and the school. We know what he will do and sacrifice to advance his personal interests. He has shown us. Sure, the program is in a good spot, now. Sure, a place can be made for Brown. But, what if things change? What if there is a rough patch or a big issue? Do we want Mack Brown, with all his interpersonal skills and connections connected to the program, helping with decisions? Even if he could be managed, is it worth the effort? What does Texas get from this attachment?- 3670 replies
-
- 10
-
Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!